Exploring mentoring and nurse faculty: An integrative review

被引:29
作者
Busby, Katie Ruth [1 ]
Draucker, Claire Burke [1 ]
Reising, Deanna L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, 600 Barnhill Dr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, 1033 E Third St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Academia; Mentoring; Mentorship; Nursing faculty; PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT; CAREER SATISFACTION; JOB-SATISFACTION; PROTEGE PROGRAM; CHALLENGES; DIMENSIONS; TRANSITION; RETENTION; STORIES; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.11.006
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Mentoring is recommended as an intervention to assist nurses in adjusting to the faculty role. While research on academic mentoring for nurse faculty is growing, the findings of this body of research have not been summarized to inform the development of mentoring programs. Purpose: The purpose of this integrative review is to summarize and synthesize the research regarding mentoring relationships and mentoring programs in academia for nurse faculty. Method: Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) methodology for integrative reviews guided this work. Electronic databases that were searched using the following terms: mentorship, mentors, mentor, nursing faculty, faculty, educational personnel, nurses, nursing, and nursing education. Primary research studies were included that examined mentoring relationships among nurse faculty, mentoring program components, and mentoring outcomes in academia. Results: A total of 18 studies were included in the review. Five main topics were identified: (1) prevalence of mentoring programs and relationships, (2) priorities within mentoring programs and relationships, (3) perceived quality of mentoring programs and relationships, (4) outcomes of mentoring programs and relationships, and (5) challenges within mentoring relationships. Conclusion: More research is needed to inform nurse faculty and leaders as they design effective mentoring programs and support the development of collaborative and enriching mentoring relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 39
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Agger CA, 2017, NURS EDUC PERSPECT, V38, P189, DOI 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000180
[2]   Relationship effectiveness for mentors: Factors associated with learning and quality [J].
Allen, TD ;
Eby, LT .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (04) :469-486
[3]   Rebuilding the research enterprise of a historical research intensive college of nursing [J].
Andrews, Jeannette O. ;
Corbett, Cynthia ;
Dail, Robin B. ;
Pinto, Bernardine M. .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2019, 67 (03) :232-243
[4]   EXPERIENCES DESCRIBED BY NOVICE TEACHING ACADEMIC STAFF IN BACCALAUREATE NURSING EDUCATION: A FOCUS ON MENTORING [J].
Anibas, Melissa ;
Brenner, Gail Hanson ;
Zorn, Cecelia R. .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2009, 25 (04) :211-217
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MENT NURS FAC TOOL K
[6]   Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships [J].
Berk, RA ;
Berg, J ;
Mortimer, R ;
Walton-Moss, B ;
Yeo, TP .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (01) :66-71
[7]   Testing for a four-dimensional structure of occupational commitment [J].
Blau, G .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 76 :469-488
[8]   Evaluation of a peer mentoring program for early career gerontological nursing faculty and its potential for application to other fields in nursing and health sciences [J].
Brody, Abraham A. ;
Edelman, Linda ;
Siegel, Elena O. ;
Foster, Victoria ;
Bailey, Donald E., Jr. ;
Bryant, Ashley Leak ;
Bond, Stewart M. .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2016, 64 (04) :332-338
[9]  
Brown T, 2017, TEACH LEARN NURS, V12, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.teln.2017.03.002
[10]   Benchmarking and gap analysis of faculty mentorship priorities and how well they are met [J].
Bruner, Deborah Watkins ;
Dunbar, Sandra ;
Higgins, Melinda ;
Martyn, Kristy .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2016, 64 (04) :321-331