Impact of two different dose-intensity chemotherapy regimens on psychological distress in early breast cancer patients

被引:33
作者
Del Mastro, L [1 ]
Costantini, M
Morasso, G
Bonci, F
Bergaglio, M
Banducci, S
Viterbori, P
Conte, P
Rosso, R
Venturini, M
机构
[1] Natl Inst Canc Res, Dept Med Oncol, Genoa, Italy
[2] Natl Inst Canc Res, Unit Clin Epidemiol & Trials, Genoa, Italy
[3] Natl Inst Canc Res, Dept Psychol, Genoa, Italy
[4] Santa Chiara Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Pisa, Italy
[5] Hosp Merate, Med Oncol Unit, Merate, Italy
关键词
breast cancer; quality of life; psychological distress; adjuvant chemotherapy; dose-intensity;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00380-X
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In order to improve outcome, new, often more toxic chemotherapy regimens are continuously investigated in early breast cancer patients. Because the expected survival improvement is small, the possible increase in the negative effects of the new treatments should be carefully evaluated. Negative effects are represented not only by acute and chronic toxicity. but also by the adverse psychological impact of chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on patient-reported psychological distress of an increase in the dose-intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with a standard regimen. Psychological distress was evaluated at baseline. during chemotherapy and after 6 and 12 months in breast cancer patients enrolled in a phase III multicentre study comparing the standard adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil every 21 days (CEF21) with the same chemotherapy given every 14 days (CEF14). 392 patients were randomised in participating centres, and 363 were evaluable for this study. Overall, 1095 out of 1446 expected questionnaires (75.7%) were collected and evaluable. At baseline, the mean scores of psychological distress were similar in the two arms. During chemotherapy, a significantly higher psychological distress was observed in the CEF 14 compared with the CEF-21 arm (32.3 +/- 1.3 versus 27.6 +/- 1.3; P = 0.009), as well as a higher cumulative incidence of anaemia, mucositis, diarrhoea, alopecia, bone pain and fatigue was observed in the CEF14 arm. In multivariate analyses, mucositis (P = 0.01), asthenia (P = 0.059), and CEF 14 treatment (P = 0,054) were independently associated with a higher psychological distress. After 6 months, psychological distress was again similar in the two arms and significantly lower when compared with baseline within each arm. A dose-intensive adjuvant regimen induces a higher, although transient., psychological distress in early breast cancer patients. Final results of the randomised trial will indicate whether such higher adverse effects of the dose-intensive regimen are counterbalanced by a higher efficacy of the experimental treatment in terms of survival. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 366
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
[2]   GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR (GM-CSF) ALLOWS ACCELERATION AND DOSE INTENSITY INCREASE OF CEF CHEMOTHERAPY - A RANDOMIZED STUDY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER [J].
ARDIZZONI, A ;
VENTURINI, M ;
SERTOLI, MR ;
GIANNESSI, PG ;
BREMA, F ;
DANOVA, M ;
TESTORE, F ;
MARIANI, GL ;
PENNUCCI, MC ;
QUEIROLO, P ;
SILVESTRO, S ;
BRUZZI, P ;
LIONETTO, R ;
LATINI, F ;
ROSSO, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 69 (02) :385-391
[3]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[4]  
Bernhard J, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P517, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<517::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-S
[6]  
Clarke M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1451
[7]   A PILOT-STUDY OF ACCELERATED CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, EPIRUBICIN AND 5-FLUOROURACIL PLUS GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AS ADJUVANT THERAPY IN EARLY BREAST-CANCER [J].
DELMASTRO, L ;
GARRONE, O ;
SERTOLI, MR ;
CANAVESE, G ;
CATTURICH, A ;
GUENZI, M ;
ROSSO, R ;
VENTURINI, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (05) :606-610
[8]   Sixteen-week multidrug regimen versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for node-positive, receptor-negative breast cancer: An intergroup study [J].
Fetting, JH ;
Gray, R ;
Fairclough, DL ;
Smith, TJ ;
Margolin, KA ;
Citron, ML ;
Grove-Conrad, M ;
Cella, D ;
Pandya, K ;
Robert, N ;
Henderson, IC ;
Osborne, CK ;
Abeloff, MD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (07) :2382-2391
[9]  
HUNRY C, 1996, LANCET, V347, P1279
[10]   Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer [J].
Levine, MN ;
Bramwell, VH ;
Pritchard, KI ;
Norris, BD ;
Shepherd, LE ;
Abu-Zahra, H ;
Findlay, B ;
Warr, D ;
Bowman, D ;
Myles, J ;
Arnold, A ;
Vandenberg, T ;
MacKenzie, R ;
Robert, J ;
Ottaway, J ;
Burnell, M ;
Williams, CK ;
Tu, DS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (08) :2651-2658