Upper bound limit analysis using linear finite elements and non-linear programming

被引:385
作者
Lyamin, AV [1 ]
Sloan, SW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Dept Civil Surveying & Environm Engn, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
limit analysis; upper bound; kinematic; finite element; nonlinear programming;
D O I
10.1002/nag.198
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A new method for computing rigorous upper bounds on the limit loads for one-, two- and three-dimensional continua is described. The formulation is based on linear finite elements, permits kinematically admissible velocity discontinuities at all interelement boundaries. and furnishes a kinematically admissible velocity field by solving a non-linear programming problem. In the latter, the objective function corresponds to the dissipated power (which is minimized) and the unknowns are subject to linear equality constraints as well as linear and non-linear inequality constraints. Provided the yield surface is convex. the optimization problem generated by the upper bound method is also convex and can be solved efficiently by applying a two-stage. quasi-Newton scheme to the corresponding Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions. A key advantage of this strategy is that its iteration count is largely independent of the mesh size. Since the formulation permits non-linear constraints on the unknowns, no linearization of the yield surface is necessary and the modelling of three-dimensional geometries presents no special difficulties. The utility of the proposed upper bound method is illustrated by applying it to a number of two- and three-dimensional boundary value problems. For a variety of two-dimensional cases, the new scheme is up to two orders of magnitude faster than an equivalent linear programming scheme which uses yield surface linearization. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 216
页数:36
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   A SMOOTH HYPERBOLIC APPROXIMATION TO THE MOHR-COULOMB YIELD CRITERION [J].
ABBO, AJ ;
SLOAN, SW .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1995, 54 (03) :427-441
[2]  
AVRIEL L, 1976, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
[3]  
Bjerrum L., 1956, Geotechnique, V6, P32, DOI [10.1680/geot.1956.6.1.32, DOI 10.1680/GEOT.1956.6.1.32]
[4]   FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD AND LIMIT ANALYSIS THEORY FOR SOIL MECHANICS PROBLEMS [J].
BOTTERO, A ;
NEGRE, R ;
PASTOR, J ;
TURGEMAN, S .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1980, 22 (01) :131-149
[5]   STABILITY OF UNSUPPORTED AXISYMMETRIC EXCAVATIONS IN SOFT CLAY [J].
BRITTO, AM ;
KUSAKABE, O .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1982, 32 (03) :261-270
[6]   A 2-STAGE FEASIBLE DIRECTIONS ALGORITHM FOR NONLINEAR CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION [J].
HERSKOVITS, J .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1986, 36 (01) :19-38
[7]  
LYAMIN AV, 1999, THESIS U NEWCASTLE
[8]  
LYAMIN AV, 1997, P 6 INT S NUM MOD GE, P367
[9]  
Pastor J, 2000, INT J NUMER ANAL MET, V24, P165, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(200002)24:2<165::AID-NAG62>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-A