A Randomized, Double-blind Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Extended Release Quetiapine Fumarate (Quetiapine XR) Monotherapy in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

被引:0
作者
Wang, Gang [1 ]
McIntyre, Alexander [2 ]
Earley, Willie R. [3 ]
Raines, Shane [3 ]
Eriksson, Hans [4 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anding Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Penticton Reg Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Penticton, BC, Canada
[3] AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] AstraZeneca R&D, Sodertalje, Sweden
关键词
antidepressive agents [pharmacological action; antipsychotic agents; clinical trial; sustained-release preparations; treatment efficacy; Phase III; controlled clinical trial; multicenter study; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PLACEBO-RESPONSE; RATING-SCALE; ANTIDEPRESSANT; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objectives: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: 10-week (8-week active-treatment/2-week post-treatment), randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study (D1448C00004). Patients received quetiapine XR 150 mg/day, escitalopram 10 mg/day, or placebo; patients with an inadequate response (<20% improvement in MADRS total score) at Week 2 received double-treatment dose. Primary endpoint: Week 8 change from randomization in MADRS total score. Secondary endpoints included: MADRS response (>= 50% improvement) and remission (score <= 8), HAM-D total and Item 1, HAM-A total, psychic and somatic, CGI-S total, PSQI global, and Q-LES-Q-SF% maximum total scores; tolerability was assessed throughout. Results: 471 patients were randomized. No significant improvements in MADRS total score were observed at Week 8 (LOCF) with either active treatment (quetiapine XR, -17.21 [p = 0.174]; escitalopram, -16.73 [p = 0.346]) versus placebo (-15.61). There were no significant differences in secondary endpoints versus placebo, with the exception of Week 8 change in PSQI global score (quetiapine XR, -4.96 [p < 0.01] versus placebo, -3.37). MMRM analysis of observed cases data suggested that the primary analysis may not be robust. Most commonly reported AEs included: dry mouth, somnolence, and dizziness for quetiapine XR; headache and nausea for escitalopram. Conclusions: In this study, neither quetiapine XR (150/300 mg/day) nor escitalopram 10/20 mg/day) showed significant separation from placebo. Both compounds have been shown previously to be effective in the treatment of MDD; possible reasons for this failed study are discussed. Quetiapine XR was generally well tolerated with a profile similar to that reported previously. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 2012;45(1):5-30.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 30
页数:26
相关论文
共 34 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], MANUAL EARLY CLIN DR
[3]  
[Anonymous], SER XR QUET FUM EXT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, J PSYCHOSOC NURS MEN
[5]  
AstraZeneca, SER XR SUMM PROD CHA
[6]   A RATING-SCALE FOR DRUG-INDUCED AKATHISIA [J].
BARNES, TRE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 :672-676
[7]   Extended-Release Quetiapine as Adjunct to an Antidepressant in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study [J].
Bauer, Michael ;
Pretorius, Herman W. ;
Constant, Eric L. ;
Earley, Willie R. ;
Szamosi, Johan ;
Brecher, Martin .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 70 (04) :540-549
[8]   Efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in major depressive disorder: A placebo-controlled, randomized study [J].
Bortnick, Brian ;
El-Khalili, Nizar ;
Banov, Michael ;
Adson, David ;
Datto, Catherine ;
Raines, Shane ;
Earley, Willie ;
Eriksson, Hans .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2011, 128 (1-2) :83-94
[9]  
Buysse D J, 1989, Psychiatry Res, V28, P193
[10]  
Clayton AH, 1997, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V33, P731