Meta-analysis of consumer's willingness-to-pay premiums for certified wood products

被引:124
作者
Cai, Zhen [1 ]
Aguilar, Francisco X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Forestry, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Meta-analysis; Willingness-to-pay; Certified wood products; Consumer preferences; Bayesian hierarchical model; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; FOREST CERTIFICATION; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; BENEFIT TRANSFER; ECONOMIC VALUE; WATER-QUALITY; UNITED-STATES; IMPROVEMENTS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfe.2012.06.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) price premiums for environmentally certified wood products has been frequently estimated using stated preference methods. Estimates of WTP premiums for certified wood products over non-certified options reported in the literature range from 1.0% to 39.3%. This paper describes a meta-analysis used to determine the key factors associated with WTP price premium estimates by examining data from 19 different studies conducted around the world. Results of Bayesian hierarchical models show that frequently purchased wood products and wood products with lower base prices tend to capture higher percentage premiums. Survey administration method was also a statistically significant factor influencing variations in WTP estimates. Results show that conjoint analysis elicited inflated WTP estimates toward certified wood products compared with contingent valuation methods. Reported WTP estimates have increased in recent years. Recommendations to reduce the error of WTP estimates toward certified wood products and improve the validity of experimental studies are provided. (C) 2012 Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 31
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for environmentally certified wood products in the US
    Aguilar, Francisco X.
    Vlosky, Richard P.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 9 (08) : 1100 - 1112
  • [2] Anderson RC, 2004, FOREST PROD J, V54, P42
  • [3] [Anonymous], J STAT SOFTWARE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1976, Educational Researcher, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X005010003, DOI 10.2307/1174772, 10.3102/0013189x005010003, 10.2307/1174772ISSN0536-1036]
  • [6] A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies
    Barrio, Melina
    Loureiro, Maria L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (05) : 1023 - 1030
  • [7] Bigsby H, 2002, FOREST PROD J, V52, P100
  • [8] Yea-saying in contingent valuation surveys
    Blamey, RK
    Bennett, JW
    Morrison, MD
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1999, 75 (01) : 126 - 141
  • [9] Borisova-Kidder A, 2006, THESIS OHIO STATE U
  • [10] The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature
    Brander, LM
    Florax, RJGM
    Vermaat, JE
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 33 (02) : 223 - 250