Old proverbs in new skins - an fMRI study on defamiliarization

被引:37
作者
Bohrn, Isabel C. [1 ,2 ]
Altmann, Ulrike [1 ,2 ]
Lubrich, Oliver [2 ,3 ]
Menninghaus, Winfried [2 ,4 ]
Jacobs, Arthur M. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Educ & Psychol, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Cluster Excellence Languages Emot, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Germanist, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Comparat Literature, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[5] Dahlem Inst Neuroimaging Emot, Berlin, Germany
关键词
reading; familiarity; fMRI; esthetics; foregrounding; proverbs; literature; RIGHT CEREBRAL HEMISPHERE; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; EYE-MOVEMENTS; METAPHORIC EXPRESSIONS; COMPREHENSION; BRAIN; PLEASURE; POETRY; PREDICTABILITY; APPRECIATION;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00204
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigated how processing fluency and defamiliarization (the art of rendering familiar notions unfamiliar) contribute to the affective and esthetic processing of reading in an event-related functional magnetic-resonance-imaging experiment. We compared the neural correlates of processing (a) familiar German proverbs, (b) unfamiliar proverbs, (c) defamiliarized variations with altered content relative to the original proverb (proverb-variants), (d) defamiliarized versions with unexpected wording but the same content as the original proverb (proverb-substitutions), and (e) non-rhetorical sentences. Here, we demonstrate that defamiliarization is an effective way of guiding attention, but that the degree of affective involvement depends on the type of defamiliarization: enhanced activation in affect-related regions (orbito-frontal cortex, medPFC) was found only if defamiliarization altered the content of the original proverb. Defamiliarization on the level of wording was associated with attention processes and error monitoring. Although proverb-variants evoked activation in affect-related regions, familiar proverbs received the highest beauty ratings.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, LIT THEORY ANTHOLOGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
[3]   Current methodology and methods in psychophysiological studies of creative thinking [J].
Bechtereva, N. P. ;
Danko, S. G. ;
Medvedev, S. V. .
METHODS, 2007, 42 (01) :100-108
[4]   Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies [J].
Binder, Jeffrey R. ;
Desai, Rutvik H. ;
Graves, William W. ;
Conant, Lisa L. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2009, 19 (12) :2767-2796
[5]  
Bleich D., 1978, SUBJECTIVE CRITICISM
[6]   EXPOSURE AND AFFECT - OVERVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH, 1968-1987 [J].
BORNSTEIN, RF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 106 (02) :265-289
[7]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[8]   The brain's default network - Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease [J].
Buckner, Randy L. ;
Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R. ;
Schacter, Daniel L. .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2008, 2008, 1124 :1-38
[9]   THE COMPREHENSION OF IDIOMS [J].
CACCIARI, C ;
TABOSSI, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1988, 27 (06) :668-683
[10]   From novel to familiar: Tuning the brain for metaphors [J].
Cardillo, Eileen R. ;
Watson, Christine E. ;
Schmidt, Gwenda L. ;
Kranjec, Alexander ;
Chatterjee, Anjan .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 59 (04) :3212-3221