Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Motor Cortex on Pain Perception and Nociceptive Reflex

被引:3
|
作者
Lin, Kon-Ping [2 ,3 ]
Liao, Kwong-Kum [2 ,3 ]
Lai, Kuan-Lin [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Lin, Yung-Yang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chiou, Shin-Yi [5 ]
Wu, Zin-An [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Chen, Jen-Tse [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Taipei 10630, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Neurol, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Physiol, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Dept Phys Therapy & Assist Technol, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Municipal Gan Dau Hosp, Dept Neurol, Taipei 11260, Taiwan
来源
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY | 2012年 / 55卷 / 03期
关键词
flexor reflex; nociceptive flexor reflex; pain suppression; transcranial magnetic stimulation; visual analogue scale; FLEXION REFLEX; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; WITHDRAWAL REFLEX; COIL STIMULATION; HUMANS; EXCITABILITY; SCIATICA; SESSIONS; DISEASE; RELIEF;
D O I
10.4077/CJP.2012.AMM117
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Noxious stimulation over the foot can evoke a nociceptive flexor reflex (NR) in the lower limb especially for tibialis anterior muscle (TA). Components of NR include the monosynaptic fast latency NRII, and the polysynaptic slow latency NRIII, supposedly a spinal segmental reflex influenced by the supraspinal control. Pain perception is quantified by visual analogous scale (VAS) and has been reported to be related to NRIII. Previous papers have reported the long lasting effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as well as TMS suppressing pain perception. The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate and prolonged effect of a single-pulse TMS to suppress NR and pain. NRIII was provoked at right TA by a train of electrical stimulation on the right toe in 10 healthy subjects. TMS was delivered over the vertex area to evoke right anterior tibialis muscle activity. A sham TMS from different directions of the coil was performed on the next day. The NRIII amplitude and VAS were measured. As a result, the amplitude of NRIII was significantly decreased than the control 50 ms pre-stimulation (0.20 +/- 0.13 mA vs. 0.65 +/- 0.42 mV, P = 0.016), 100 ms pre-stimulation (0.10 +/- 0.10 mA vs. 0.65 +/- 0.42 mV, P = 0.001), 15 min post-stimulation (0.12 +/- 0.09 mA vs. 0.65 +/- 0.42 mV, P = 0.004), and 30 min post-stimulation (0.41 +/- 0.21 mA vs. 0.65 +/- 0.42 mV, P = 0.046). VAS was diminished compared with the control 50 ms pre-stimulation (3.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 5.4 +/- 1.3, P = 0.002), 100 ms pre-stimulation (2.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 5.4 +/- 1.3, P < 0.001) and 15 min post-stimulation (3.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 5.4 +/- 1.3, P = 0.046). The NRIII amplitude was well correlated with VAS in reduction during the TMS condition and 15 min after electrical stimulation (P < 0.001). The sham TMS did not suppress NRIII or VAS. In conclusion, our results indicate that NRIII and the nociception can be inhibited by one single pulse TMS and such an effect can last for a period of time.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RELIABILITY OF TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR MAPPING THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
    MORTIFEE, P
    STEWART, H
    SCHULZER, M
    EISEN, A
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 93 (02): : 131 - 137
  • [42] Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex Induces Plastic Changes in Cortical Nociceptive Processing
    Kirimoto, Hikari
    Tamaki, Hiroyuki
    Otsuru, Naufumi
    Yamashiro, Koya
    Onishi, Hideaki
    Nojima, Ippei
    Oliviero, Antonio
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [43] Effect of transcranial static magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex
    Shibata, Sumiya
    Watanabe, Tatsunori
    Yukawa, Yoshihiro
    Minakuchi, Masatoshi
    Shimomura, Ryota
    Mima, Tatsuya
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 723
  • [44] An investigation of motor function in schizophrenia using transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex
    Puri, BK
    Davey, NJ
    Ellaway, PH
    Lewis, SW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 169 (06) : 690 - 695
  • [45] Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex on Visceral Pain in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Ibrahim, Nagwa Mostafa
    Abdelhameed, Khaled Mohamed
    Kamal, Shereen Mamdouh Mohamed
    Khedr, Eman Mohamed Hussein
    Kotb, Hassan Ibrahim Mohamed
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (03) : 550 - 560
  • [46] Analgesic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in neuropathic pain: Influence of theta burst stimulation priming
    Lefaucheur, J. -P.
    Ayache, S. S.
    Sorel, M.
    Farhat, W. H.
    Zouari, H. G.
    Ciampi de Andrade, D.
    Ahdab, R.
    Menard-Lefaucheur, I.
    Brugieres, P.
    Goujon, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 16 (10) : 1403 - 1413
  • [47] Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Motor Cortex for Neuropathic Pain
    Zang, Yaning
    Zhang, Yongni
    Lai, Xigui
    Yang, Yujie
    Guo, Jiabao
    Gu, Shanshan
    Zhu, Yi
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 15
  • [48] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in management of chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review
    Gatzinsky, Kliment
    Bergh, Christina
    Liljegren, Ann
    Silander, Hans
    Samuelsson, Jennifer
    Svanberg, Therese
    Samuelsson, Ola
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2021, 21 (01) : 8 - 21
  • [49] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the visual cortex modulates trigeminal nociceptive pathways
    Sava, S. L.
    Coppola, G.
    De Pasqua, V.
    Pierelli, F.
    Schoenen, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2010, 11 : S56 - S57
  • [50] Evaluation of the Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex on Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Pain Control in the Short Term
    Soltani, Ahmad
    Ghavipisheh, Mahsa
    Ardakani, Ramin Manouchehri
    Ahrari, Iman
    Salehi, Sina
    Farrokhi, Majid Reza
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (02) : 164 - 170