The Three Approaches to Professionalization in Technical Communication

被引:0
作者
Carliner, Saul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Educ Doctoral Program, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, Dept Educ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] STC, McAllen, TX USA
关键词
professionalization; certification; branding of technical communication; SOCIOLOGICAL-ANALYSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Purpose: Explores internal divisions within our profession by exploring one particular type of tension: that technical communicators do not have a unified view of professionalization for the field. Method: Proposes that prevailing approaches to professionalization are rooted in theories of occupations, the exclusive right to perform a job. True occupations have such rights legally; aspiring occupations like ours are disciplines. Common components of an infrastructure for occupations include professional organizations, bodies of knowledge, education, professional activities, and certification. Results: Disciplines often establish these in anticipation of becoming an occupation, but some practicing professionals interpret and use them differently, resulting in a spectrum of approaches to professionalization. At one end of the spectrum is formal professionalism, which views professionalization as a stepping stone to full occupational status. It is rooted in a worldview that values expertise and sees the infrastructure of an occupation supporting the development of expertise and controlling access to the profession. In the center of the spectrum is quasiprofessionalization, in which individuals participate in the activities of the occupational infrastructure but without the expectation of exclusive rights to perform the work. Quasiprofessionalization is rooted in professional identity. At the other end of the spectrum is contraprofessionalization, which refers to initiatives that offer or promote professional services outside of parts of or the entire infrastructure, sometimes circumventing it completely. This world view is rooted in market theory and characterized by concepts like do-it-yourself (DIY), user-generated, and subject matter expert (SME)-provided documentation. Conclusions: The differing views suggest tensions regarding support for specific efforts to professionalize technical communication, including formal branding of the profession, establishment of certification, and support for professional organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 65
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PC MAGAZINE ENCY
[2]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES 1213
[3]  
[Anonymous], Information Technology and the Teaching of History
[4]  
ASTD CI, 2009, LOOK BE BEST CPLP IS
[5]  
ASTD CI, 2010, NO ON ASK ME DO IT
[6]  
Brown JS, 2000, HARVARD BUS REV, V78, P73
[7]  
Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010, STAND OCC CLASS
[8]  
Burton S., 2008, INTERCOM, V56, P3
[9]  
Carliner S, 2001, TECH COMMUN-STC, V48, P156
[10]  
Carliner S., 2011, HON CASAE ACEEA PAST