Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Independent External Validation for Open and Laparoscopic Approaches

被引:112
作者
Shubert, Christopher R. [1 ,2 ]
Wagie, Amy E. [2 ]
Farnell, Michael B. [1 ]
Nagorney, David M. [1 ]
Que, Florencia G. [1 ]
Lombardo, KMarie Reid [1 ]
Truty, Mark J. [1 ]
Smoot, Rory L. [1 ]
Kendrick, Michael L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Subspecialty Gen Surg, Dept Surg, Sect Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Surg Outcomes Program, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
ISGPF CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; RESECTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: A clinical risk score for pancreatic fistula (CRS-PF) was recently reported to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). An independent external validation has not been performed. Our hypothesis was that CRS-PF predicts POPF after both laparoscopic and open PD. STUDY DESIGN: The CRS-PF was calculated from a retrospective review of patients undergoing PD from January 2007 to February 2014. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was graded using International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula criteria. Grade B and C leaks were defined as clinically significant. Performance was measured based on sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, accuracy, and R-2. RESULTS: There were 808 patients who met inclusion criteria; 539 (66.7%) had open and 269 (33.3%) had laparoscopic PD. The CRS-PF was high risk in 134 patients, intermediate in 492, low in 135, and negligible in 47. Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 191 (23.6%) patients (grade A, 3.8%; B, 14.2%; and C, 5.6%), and it increased with risk category (R-2 = 0.935 all, 0.898 open, and 0.968 laparoscopic). High and intermediate risk categories were combined and classified as "test positive," and negligible and low risk categories were combined and classified " test negative," resulting in a CRS-PF with a sensitivity of 95% and a negative predictive value of 96% for predicting POPF. Contrary to previous studies, grade A POPF increased with increasing CRS-PF and POPF did not correlate with estimated blood loss (R-2 = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The CRS-PF was validated independently by predicting POPF for both laparoscopic and open PD. Predictive performance was at least as good for laparoscopic PD as for open PD. Lack of correlation with estimated blood loss suggests CRS-PF might be tailored for improved performance. The CRS-PF is a clinically useful tool for POPF risk stratification after PD and allows for targeted intra-and postoperative measures to address patients at increased risk. (C) 2015 by the American College of Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 698
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Preoperative Nomogram to Predict Risk of Perioperative Mortality Following Pancreatic Resections for Malignancy Discussant [J].
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Mulvihill, Sean ;
Afuh, Chantal ;
Del Castillo, Carlos Fernandez .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (12) :2161-2162
[2]   Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall Outcomes and Severity of Complications Using the Accordion Severity Grading System [J].
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Stauffer, John A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (06) :810-819
[3]   Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections - Changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization [J].
Balcom, JH ;
Rattner, DW ;
Warshaw, AL ;
Chang, Y ;
Fernandez-del Castillo, C .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (04) :391-397
[4]   Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review [J].
Boggi, Ugo ;
Amorese, Gabriella ;
Vistoli, Fabio ;
Caniglia, Fabio ;
De Lio, Nelide ;
Perrone, Vittorio ;
Barbarello, Linda ;
Belluomini, Mario ;
Signori, Stefano ;
Mosca, Franco .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (01) :9-23
[5]   A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy [J].
Callery, Mark P. ;
Pratt, Wande B. ;
Kent, Tara S. ;
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Vollmer, Charles M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (01) :1-14
[6]   Predictive factors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Cheng, Qingbao ;
Zhang, Baihe ;
Zhang, Yongjie ;
Jiang, Xiaoqing ;
Zhang, Baohua ;
Yi, Bin ;
Luo, Xiangji ;
Wu, Mengchao .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 139 (01) :22-29
[7]   Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Choe, Yun-Mee ;
Lee, Keon-Young ;
Oh, Cheong-Ah ;
Lee, Joung-Bum ;
Choi, Sun Keun ;
Hur, Yoon-Seok ;
Kim, Sei-Joong ;
Cho, Young Up ;
Ahn, Seung-Ik ;
Hong, Kee-Chun ;
Shin, Seok-Hwan ;
Kim, Kyung-Rae .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 14 (45) :6970-6974
[8]   Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Major Vascular Resection: a Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Approaches [J].
Croome, Kris P. ;
Farnell, Michael B. ;
Que, Florencia G. ;
Reid-Lombardo, KMarie ;
Truty, Mark J. ;
Nagorney, David M. ;
Kendrick, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (01) :189-194
[9]   Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume [J].
Gouma, DJ ;
van Geenen, RCI ;
van Gulik, TM ;
de Haan, RJ ;
de Wit, LT ;
Busch, ORC ;
Obertop, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (06) :786-794
[10]   Preoperative Factors Predict Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality After Pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Greenblatt, David Yu ;
Kelly, Kaitlyn J. ;
Rajamanickam, Victoria ;
Wan, Yin ;
Hanson, Todd ;
Rettammel, Robert ;
Winslow, Emily R. ;
Cho, Clifford S. ;
Weber, Sharon M. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (08) :2126-2135