Spectral Karyotyping for identification of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities at a national reference laboratory

被引:12
作者
Anguiano, Arturo [1 ]
Wang, Boris T. [1 ]
Wang, Shirong R. [1 ]
Boyar, Fatih Z. [1 ]
Mahon, Loretta W. [1 ]
El Naggar, Mohamed M. [1 ]
Kohn, Peter H. [1 ]
Haddadin, Mary H. [1 ]
Sulcova, Vladimira [1 ]
Sbeiti, Adam H. [1 ]
Ayad, Mervat S. [1 ]
White, Beverly J. [1 ]
Strom, Charles M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Quest Diagnost Nichols Inst, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92690 USA
关键词
Spectral Karyotyping; Marker Chromosome; FISH; array CGH; SUPERNUMERARY MARKER CHROMOSOMES; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSTICS; DERIVATIVES; BREAKPOINTS; FISH;
D O I
10.1186/1755-8166-5-3
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Spectral karyotyping is a diagnostic tool that allows visualization of chromosomes in different colors using the FISH technology and a spectral imaging system. To assess the value of spectral karyotyping analysis for identifying constitutional supernumerary marker chromosomes or derivative chromosomes at a national reference laboratory, we reviewed the results of 179 consecutive clinical samples (31 prenatal and 148 postnatal) submitted for spectral karyotyping. Over 90% of the cases were requested to identify either small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) or chromosomal exchange material detected by G-banded chromosome analysis. We also reviewed clinical indications of those cases with marker chromosomes in which chromosomal origin was identified by spectral karyotyping. Our results showed that spectral karyotyping identified the chromosomal origin of marker chromosomes or the source of derivative chromosomal material in 158 (88%) of the 179 clinical cases; the identification rate was slightly higher for postnatal (89%) compared to prenatal (84%) cases. Cases in which the origin could not be identified had either a small marker chromosome present at a very low level of mosaicism (< 10%), or contained very little euchromatic material. Supplemental FISH analysis confirmed the spectral karyotyping results in all 158 cases. Clinical indications for prenatal cases were mainly for marker identification after amniocentesis. For postnatal cases, the primary indications were developmental delay and multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). The most frequently encountered markers were of chromosome 15 origin for satellited chromosomes, and chromosomes 2 and 16 for non satellited chromosomes. We were able to obtain pertinent clinical information for 47% (41/88) of cases with an identified abnormal chromosome. We conclude that spectral karyotyping is sufficiently reliable for use and provides a valuable diagnostic tool for establishing the origin of supernumerary marker chromosomes or derivative chromosomal material that cannot be identified with standard cytogenetic techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Identification of 14 rare marker chromosomes and derivatives by spectral Karyotyping in prenatal and postnatal diagnosis [J].
Guanciali-Franchi, P ;
Calabrese, G ;
Morizio, E ;
Fantasia, D ;
Colosimo, A ;
Rinaldi, MM ;
Cristini, L ;
Simonelli, A ;
Lonardo, F ;
Turci, A ;
Zatterale, A ;
Lagana, C ;
Stuppia, L ;
Sabatino, G ;
Palka, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2004, 127A (02) :144-148
[2]   Identification of de novo chromosomal markers and derivatives by spectral karyotyping [J].
Haddad, BR ;
Schröck, E ;
Meck, J ;
Cowan, J ;
Young, H ;
Ferguson-Smith, MA ;
du Manoir, S ;
Ried, T .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 103 (05) :619-625
[3]   Small marker chromosome identification in metaphase and interphase using centromeric multiplex FISH (CM-FISH) [J].
Henegariu, O ;
Bray-Ward, P ;
Artan, S ;
Vance, GH ;
Qumsyieh, M ;
Ward, DC .
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2001, 81 (04) :475-481
[4]   Analysis of marker or complex chromosomal rearrangements present in pre- and post-natal karyotypes utilizing a combination of G-banding, spectral karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization [J].
Heng, HHQ ;
Ye, CJ ;
Yang, F ;
Ebrahim, S ;
Liu, G ;
Bremer, SW ;
Thomas, CM ;
Ye, J ;
Chen, TJ ;
Tuck-Muller, C ;
Yu, JW ;
Krawetz, SA ;
Johnson, A .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2003, 63 (05) :358-367
[5]  
Hilgenfeld Eva, 2002, Methods Mol Med, V68, P29
[6]  
Huang B, 1998, AM J MED GENET, V80, P368, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981204)80:4<368::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-B
[8]   Limitations of chromosome classification by multicolor karyotyping [J].
Lee, C ;
Gisselsson, D ;
Jin, C ;
Nordgren, A ;
Ferguson, DO ;
Blennow, E ;
Fletcher, JA ;
Morton, CC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 68 (04) :1043-1047
[9]  
Liehr T, 2010, METHODS MOL BIOL, V659, P231, DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-789-1_16
[10]   Handling small supernumerary marker chromosomes in prenatal diagnostics [J].
Liehr, Thomas ;
Ewers, Elisabeth ;
Kosyakova, Nadezda ;
Klaschka, Vivian ;
Rietz, Franziska ;
Wagner, Rebecca ;
Weise, Anja .
EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2009, 9 (04) :317-324