Peer effects in R&D investment policy: Evidence from China

被引:39
作者
Peng, Zhen [1 ]
Lian, Yujun [2 ]
Forson, Joseph A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Management, Dept Accounting, 161 Yinglong Rd, Guangzhou 510520, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Univ Coll, Dept Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Educ, Dept Banking & Finance, Winneba, Ghana
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
competition; imitation; industry peers; information; peer effects; R&D investment; FIRMS; COMPETITION; DYNAMICS; FINANCE; PAY;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2028
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Using a typical linear model on a sample of listed firms in China over a period of 10 years (2006-2016), this study empirically attempts proving how peer effects influence corporate research and development (R&D) investment decision. The study goes further to demonstrate that peer effects play a significant and critical role in determining corporate R&D investment policies, and by extension the more important determinant than most traditional firm-specific factors. After dealing with endogeneity bias and conducting further robustness checks, the above conclusions were valid in this study. It has been theorized in contemporary research that both information and market competition are the main channels through which one can best appreciate peer effects and that firms with weak information acquisition ability and in highly uncertain or competitive environment are more likely to be affected by peer groups. We also find evidence that a firm's R&D investment status relative to its peer firms will affect its R&D investment decision. Moreover, the direction of peer effects follows the law of imitation. Thus, firms are more likely to imitate those peers who share similar characteristics. Yet, leading firms and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are exceptionally different as their R&D decisions are sensitive to both peer-followers and non-SOEs respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:4516 / 4533
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   THE DYNAMICS OF MULTIMARKET COMPETITION IN EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION ACTIVITIES [J].
Anand, Jaideep ;
Mesquita, Luiz F. ;
Vassolo, Roberto S. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 52 (04) :802-821
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J KOREAN STAT SOC, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JKSS.2017.07.002
[3]   Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks [J].
Aral, Sinan ;
Walker, Dylan .
SCIENCE, 2012, 337 (6092) :337-341
[4]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636
[5]   CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND INNOVATION: A SURVEY [J].
Belloc, Filippo .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2012, 26 (05) :835-864
[6]   Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? [J].
Bizjak, John M. ;
Lemmon, Michael L. ;
Naveen, Lalitha .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (02) :152-168
[7]   Peer Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Cao, Jie ;
Liang, Hao ;
Zhan, Xintong .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (12) :5487-5503
[8]  
Chen SL, 2017, CHINA J ACCOUNT RES, V10, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.cjar.2016.11.002
[9]   Peer effects on corporate cash holdings [J].
Chen, Yi-Wen ;
Chan, Konan ;
Chang, Yuanchen .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2019, 61 :213-227
[10]   RACING TO INVEST? THE DYNAMICS OF COMPETITION IN ETHICAL DRUG DISCOVERY [J].
Cockburn, Iain ;
Henderson, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 1994, 3 (03) :481-519