FDG-PET in differential diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcomas

被引:54
作者
Aoki, J
Watanabe, H
Shinozaki, T
Tokunaga, M
Inoue, T
Endo, K
机构
[1] Gunma Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol & Nucl Med, Maebashi, Gumma 3718511, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Maebashi, Gumma 3718511, Japan
关键词
bones; neoplasms; chondroma; chondrosarcoma; emission computed tomography (PET);
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199907000-00022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to investigate the usefulness of PET with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) in the differential diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcomas. Method: Four enchondromas, one osteochondroma, and six chondrosarcomas were prospectively studied by FDG-PET. The significance of the standardized uptake value (SUV) was evaluated in comparison with clinical. radiological, and histopathological findings of the tumors. Results: The SUV ranged from 0.7 to 1.3 (mean 0.96 +/- 0.22) in benign cartilage tumors and from 1.3 to 3.3 (2.23 +/- 0.80) in chondrosarcomas. This SUV difference between benign and malignant tumors was statistically significant (p = 0.011) in contrast to considerable overlap of clinical and radiological findings. Among chondrosarcomas, the SW of one Grade I tumor was 1.3; those of four Grade II tumors were 1.3, 1.9, 2.5, and 3.1; and that of one Grade III tumor was 3.3. Conclusion: Our preliminary study showed that FDG-PET could be an objective and quantitative adjunct in the differential diagnosis and grading of chondrosarcomas.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 608
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] ADLER LP, 1991, J NUCL MED, V32, P1508
  • [2] Does fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic imaging of tumours benefit oncology?
    Brock, CS
    Meikle, SR
    Price, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 24 (06) : 691 - 705
  • [3] DALINKA MK, 1990, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V28, P461
  • [4] Benign versus malignant intraosseous lesions: Discrimination by means of PET with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose
    Dehdashti, F
    Siegel, BA
    Griffeth, LK
    Fusselman, MJ
    Trask, DD
    McGuire, AH
    McGuire, DJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (01) : 243 - 247
  • [5] EVANS HL, 1977, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V40, P818, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197708)40:2<818::AID-CNCR2820400234>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-B
  • [7] GALLAGHER BM, 1978, J NUCL MED, V19, P1154
  • [8] GARRISON RC, 1982, CANCER, V49, P1890, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19820501)49:9<1890::AID-CNCR2820490923>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-U
  • [10] Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade I chondrosarcoma
    Geirnaerdt, MJA
    Hermans, J
    Bloem, JL
    Kroon, HM
    Pope, TL
    Taminiau, AHM
    Hogendoorn, PCW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) : 1097 - 1104