Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses

被引:175
作者
Harbaugh, William T. [1 ,2 ]
Krause, Kate [3 ]
Vesterlund, Lise [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] NBER, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
probability weighting; subjective expected utility; prospect theory; children; risk;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016316725855
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we examine how risk attitudes change with age. We present participants from age 5 to 64 with choices between simple gambles and the expected value of the gambles. The gambles are over both gains and losses, and vary in the probability of the non-zero payoff. Surprisingly, we find that many participants are risk seeking when faced with high-probability prospects over gains and risk averse when faced with small-probability prospects. Over losses we find the exact opposite. Children's choices are consistent with the underweighting of low-probability events and the overweighting of high-probability ones. This tendency diminishes with age, and on average adults appear to use the objective probability when evaluating risky prospects.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 84
页数:32
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1931, FDN MATH
  • [2] BATTALIO RC, 1985, AM ECON REV, V75, P597
  • [3] Camerer C., 1998, Experimental Economics, V1, P163
  • [4] Camerer C., 1989, POLY ANAL MGMT, V8, P565
  • [5] Camerer C.F., 1989, J. Risk Uncertainty, V2, P61, DOI [10.1007/BF00055711, DOI 10.1007/BF00055711]
  • [6] VIOLATIONS OF THE BETWEENNESS AXIOM AND NONLINEARITY IN PROBABILITY
    CAMERER, CF
    HO, TH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1994, 8 (02) : 167 - 196
  • [7] Eckel D., 1998, PLAYING IT SAF UNPUB
  • [8] THE PREDICTION OF DECISIONS AMONG BETS
    EDWARDS, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1955, 50 (03): : 201 - 214
  • [9] HOLT CA, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P508
  • [10] Just who are you calling risk averse?
    Isaac, RM
    James, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2000, 20 (02) : 177 - 187