Using Response-prompting Procedures During Small-group Direct Instruction: Outcomes and Procedural Variations

被引:48
作者
Ledford, Jennifer R. [1 ]
Lane, Justin D. [2 ]
Elam, Katherine L. [3 ]
Wolery, Mark
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Peabody Coll, Dept Special Educ, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Metropolitan Nashville Publ Sch, Nashville, TN USA
来源
AJIDD-AMERICAN JOURNAL ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES | 2012年 / 117卷 / 05期
关键词
direct instruction; prompting procedures; small group; discrete behaviors; CONSTANT TIME-DELAY; AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS; SINGLE-SUBJECT RESEARCH; SMART BOARD TECHNOLOGY; SPECIAL-EDUCATION; ATTENTIONAL RESPONSES; WORD RECOGNITION; SEVERE HANDICAPS; STUDENTS; DISABILITIES;
D O I
10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.413
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Research was reviewed on small-group instruction for learners with disabilities. The review was conducted for articles published between 1990 and 2010 on the application of small-group direct instruction to teach discrete skills using prompting procedures. A total of 47 articles with 197 participants and 687 replications of effects was located. Small-group instruction was effective for 195 of 197 participants and across variations in implementation and contexts. Implementers were primarily special education personnel, and instruction typically occurred in special education settings. Rigorous designs were used in all studies, and fidelity was assessed in 46 of 47 studies and was uniformly high. Students consistently reached criterion on their own target behaviors, generalized those behaviors, maintained them, and learned the behaviors taught to their peers (when this was measured, which occurred in a majority of the studies). Future research should examine comparisons of procedural variables and promoting social behaviors between group mates.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 434
页数:22
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Alig-Cybriwsky C., 1990, Journal of Early Intervention, V14, P99
[2]  
[Anonymous], ED TREATMENT CHILDRE
[3]  
Anthony L., 1996, Journal of Behavioral Education, V6, P111, DOI 10.1007/BF02110228
[4]   COMPARISON OF PREDICTABLE AND UNPREDICTABLE TRIAL SEQUENCES DURING SMALL-GROUP INSTRUCTION [J].
AULT, MJ ;
WOLERY, M ;
GAST, DL ;
DOYLE, PM ;
MARTIN, CP .
LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 1990, 13 (01) :12-29
[5]  
Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
[6]  
Beretvas S.N., 2008, EVIDENCE BASED COMMU, V2, P129, DOI [DOI 10.1080/17489530802446302, 10.1080/17489530802446302]
[7]   EXTERNAL VALIDITY AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR [J].
BIRNBRAUER, JS .
ANALYSIS AND INTERVENTION IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 1981, 1 (02) :117-132
[8]   A national sample of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders: Special education services and parent satisfaction [J].
Bitterman, Amy ;
Daley, Tamara C. ;
Misra, Sunil ;
Carlson, Elaine ;
Markowitz, Joy .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2008, 38 (08) :1509-1517
[9]  
Brown F., 1980, Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, V5, P352
[10]   Small Group Computer-Assisted Instruction With SMART Board Technology An Investigation of Observational and Incidental Learning of Nontarget Information [J].
Campbell, Monica L. ;
Mechling, Linda C. .
REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2009, 30 (01) :47-57