Divorce after hundreds of years of marriage: Prospects for coal mining in the Czech Republic with regard to the European Union

被引:18
作者
Sivek, Martin [1 ]
Jirasek, Jakub [1 ,2 ]
Kavina, Pavel [3 ]
Vojnarova, Marketa [1 ]
Kurkova, Tereza [1 ]
Basova, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Min & Geol, Dept Geol Engn, 17 Listopadu 15-2172, Ostrava 70833, Czech Republic
[2] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Min & Geol, Ctr ENET, 17 Listopadu 15-2172, Ostrava 70833, Czech Republic
[3] Minist Ind & Trade Czech Republ, State Mineral Policy Div, Frantisku 32, Prague 11015 1, Czech Republic
关键词
Lignite; Bituminous coal; Energy policy; Energy concept; Energy security; European Union; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGIEWENDE; POLICY; TRENDS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111524
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since 2015, the Government of the Czech Republic has adopted some decisions that have altered the prospects for coal mining. In 2015 it adjusted its mineral and energy policy by allowing for lignite to be mined in a part of the North Bohemian Basin that was blocked by a political decision driven by the environmental reasons in 1991. An updated state energy policy came into force in 2015, and the government approved a new Mineral Policy of the Czech Republic in 2017. Based on these new data, it is possible to compare the coal mining concept, energy mix, and energy dependence in the Czech Republic with selected EU Member States, specifically Poland and Germany. The analysis shows that the prospects for coal use in the European Union are not only influenced by the amount of coal production in the EU Member States but also by the amount of coal imported to individual EU countries. It is also anticipated that the future of European coal production will not only be determined by geological, mining technology and economic criteria but rather by the increasingly important role of political decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Agreement P, 2015, REP C PART UN FRAM C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, REP IND EXP COMM EV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, STAT RAW MAT POL CZE
[6]  
Bufka A., 2019, DEV GROSS ELECT HEAT
[7]   Comparative life cycle assessment of current and future electricity generation systems in the Czech Republic and Poland [J].
Burchart-Korol, Dorota ;
Pustejovska, Pavlina ;
Blaut, Agata ;
Jursova, Simona ;
Korol, Jerzy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (11) :2165-2177
[8]   Anti-fossil frames: Examining narratives of the opposition to brown coal mining in the Czech Republic [J].
Cernoch, Filip ;
Lehotsky, Lukas ;
Ocelik, Petr ;
Osicka, Jan ;
Vencourova, Zaneta .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 54 :140-149
[9]   Hinkley point C: A new chance for nuclear power plant construction in central Europe? [J].
Cernoch, Filip ;
Zapletalova, Veronika .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 83 :165-168
[10]   Sustainable development of the Indian coal sector [J].
Chikkatur, Ananth P. ;
Sagar, Ambuj D. ;
Sankar, T. L. .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (08) :942-953