Effects of Runoff Characteristics and Filter Type on Geotextile Storm Water Treatment

被引:8
作者
Franks, Carmen A. [1 ]
Davis, Allen P. [2 ]
Aydilek, Ahmet H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dist Dept Transportat, Washington, DC 20003 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Geotextile; Filtration; Storm water; Suspended solids; Filter criteria; PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION; HIGHWAY RUNOFF; URBAN; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; BIORETENTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000675
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Urban storm water runoff carries particulate matter and other pollutants to water bodies, causing environmental problems. Removing suspended solids from runoff through geotextile filtration is a storm water control measure currently under investigation, which could help lessen the negative impacts of storm water on aquatic ecosystems. In this study, three geotextiles were tested in a laboratory setup with influent suspensions having hydraulic loading rates, total suspended solids (TSS) concentration, and particle-size distributions similar to those reported for urban highway storm water runoff. The results indicated that after a short priming period, all three geotextiles can effectively remove suspended solids to below a target concentration of 30mg/L. The results also showed that influent hydraulic loading rate and TSS concentration have minimal effects on the total mass of solids captured by the filter, whereas particle-size distribution does affect the total mass of solids captured by the filters. The retention criteria for choosing the appropriate geotextile for storm water treatment established in recent literature were evaluated by using the laboratory results. The geotextiles and sand filters were directly compared by using the results of the laboratory column testing of sand filters performed for this study. The results indicate that a geotextile will outlast a sand filter in terms of total solids loading under similar conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], M43 AASHTO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, Water Quality and Treatment: A Handbook of Community Water Supplies, V5th
  • [3] ASTM C33, 2013, Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates, P1
  • [4] Aydilek A.H., 2011, HDB GEOSYNTHETIC ENG, P67
  • [5] Ayyub B.M., 2003, Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers and Scientists, V2nd
  • [6] Performance, cost, and maintenance requirements of Austin sand filters
    Barrett, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2003, 129 (03): : 234 - 242
  • [7] Barrett ME, 2006, WATER ENVIRON RES, V78, P2177, DOI 10.2175/106143005X82217
  • [8] California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003, CAL STORMW BMP HDB N
  • [9] Coduto DonaldP., 2011, Geotechnical Engineering: Principles and Practices, V2nd
  • [10] Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts
    Davis, Allen P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2008, 13 (02) : 90 - 95