Safety and Effectiveness of Repeat Arterial Closure Using the AngioSeal Device in Patients with Hepatic Malignancy

被引:12
作者
Hieb, Robert A. [1 ]
Neisen, Melissa J. [2 ]
Hohenwalter, Eric J. [1 ]
Molnar, Jim A. [1 ]
Rilling, William S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Froedtert Mem Lutheran Hosp, Dept Radiol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Minneapolis Vasc Phys, Plymouth, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2008.09.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of the AngioSeal device for repeat arterial closure in patients with hepatic malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with hepatic malignancy who had undergone repeated arterial closure with the AngioSeal device was performed. All charts for patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization or TheraSphere radioembolization were reviewed for the method of hemostasis and the number of arterial closures. A total of 53 patients (58.5% men, 41.5% women; mean age, 58.7 years) had repeat AngioSeal arterial puncture closure after chemoembolization or TheraSphere treatment. Percutaneous closure of the common femoral artery with the AngioSeal device was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The patients were examined for complications on follow-up. Effectiveness was defined by the ability to obtain satisfactory hemostasis. Safety was assessed by the absence of groin complications and by vessel patency on follow-up angiograms of the puncture site obtained at subsequent liver-directed therapy sessions. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients in this study group had a total of 203 common femoral artery punctures. There were a total of 161 closures with the AngioSeal device (79.3%): 58 (36%) single closures and 103 (64.0%) repeat closures. Of the 161 attempts at AngioSeal closure, there was one closure failure in the single-puncture group, yielding a success rate of 98.3%; and one closure failure in the repeat-puncture group, yielding a success rate of 99%. In these two patients, hemostasis was achieved with traditional manual compression without the need for any other device, and no complications were noted. The overall success rate of AngioSeal device closure was 98.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The repeat use of the AngioSeal closure device is safe and effective in patients with hepatic malignancy undergoing regional oncologic interventional procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:1704 / 1708
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] The use of the angioseal device for femoral artery closure
    Abando, A
    Hood, D
    Weaver, F
    Katz, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 40 (02) : 287 - 290
  • [2] The safety and efficacy of Angioseal in therapeutic endovascular interventions
    Aksoy, M.
    Becquemin, J. P.
    Desgranges, P.
    Allaire, E.
    Kobeiter, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 32 (01) : 90 - 93
  • [3] Restick following initial angioseal use
    Applegate, RJ
    Rankin, KM
    Little, WC
    Kahl, FR
    Kutcher, MA
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 58 (02) : 181 - 184
  • [4] APPLEGATE RJ, 2006, J INTERV CARDIOL, V19, P6
  • [5] Lower limb ischemic complications after the use of arterial puncture closure devices
    Biancari, F.
    Ylonen, K.
    Mosorin, M.
    Lepojarvi, M.
    Juvonen, T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 32 (05) : 504 - 505
  • [6] Carey D, 2001, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V52, P3, DOI 10.1002/1522-726X(200101)52:1<3::AID-CCD1002>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-G
  • [8] Incidence of vascular injuries after use of the angio-seal closure device following endovascular procedures in a single center
    Castelli, P
    Caronno, R
    Piffaretti, G
    Tozzi, M
    Lomazzi, C
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 30 (03) : 280 - 284
  • [9] The safety and efficacy of a percutaneous closure device in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization
    Chrisman, HB
    Liu, DM
    Bui, JT
    Resnick, SA
    Sato, K
    Chen, R
    Vogelzang, RL
    Omary, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (03) : 347 - 350
  • [10] Cooper CL, 1999, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V48, P301, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199911)48:3<301::AID-CCD15>3.0.CO