Disentangling the connections: A network analysis of approaches to urban green infrastructure

被引:45
作者
Badiu, Denisa L. [1 ]
Nita, Andreea [1 ]
Ioja, Cristian I. [1 ]
Nita, Mihai R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Ctr Environm Res & Impact Studies, 1 Nicolae Balcescu, Bucharest 010041, Romania
关键词
Ecosystem services; Literature review; Network analysis; Planning; Urban green infrastructure; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; METROPOLITAN-AREA; MULTISCALE ASSESSMENT; PROTECTED AREAS; BENEFITS; GOVERNANCE; VALUATION; FUTURE; PARKS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.013
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
During the last two decades, a mounting body of research has emerged on the value, use and overall importance of urban green infrastructure. From the contribution to human well-being and sustainable development, urban green infrastructure is positioned as a relevant concept within ecosystem services and nature-based solutions. Our research objective is to identify the main scientific approaches to urban green infrastructure, while accounting for different comparative criteria, such as subject of analysis, methods used, location or scale. We used an analysis of scientific literature in order to identify trends on urban green infrastructure research. We designed a study consisting of peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings, published between 2005 and 2017 and listed in Science Direct database. We identified 497 peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings, of which we validated 490 papers that included keywords. We used network analysis to identify significant patterns on the keywords co-occurrence in the scientific literature. Our main results identified the most used, powerful and influential keywords, while comparing the European network with the rest of the world. We found that terms such as: green infrastructure, ecosystem services and urban forestry are among the most used keywords in the ongoing body of literature. Our study tries to better understand the directions used so far to analyse urban green infrastructure and the differences that occur between areas or scale of analysis. Main findings suggested by our results could anticipate shortcomings or future research, while better establishing the importance of urban green infrastructure as a nature-based solution.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 220
页数:10
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
Ahern J., 2007, CITIES FUTURE INTEGR, P267, DOI [10.1007/s11356-021-17766-y, DOI 10.1007/S11356-021-17766-Y]
[2]   Integrating the third dimension into the concept of urban ecosystem services: A review [J].
Alavipanah, Sadroddin ;
Haase, Dagmar ;
Lakes, Tobia ;
Qureshi, Salman .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 72 :374-398
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, URBANIZATION BIODIVE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GREEN INFR ENH EUR N
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[7]  
Artmann M., 2017, Ecological Indicators, P1
[8]   The role of urban green spaces in care facilities for elderly people across European cities [J].
Artmann, Martina ;
Chen, Xianwen ;
Ioja, Cristian ;
Hof, Angela ;
Onose, Diana ;
Ponizy, Lidia ;
Lamovsek, Alma Zavodnik ;
Breuste, Juergen .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2017, 27 :203-213
[9]  
Badiu D. L., 2018, LANDSC URBAN PLAN
[10]   Is urban green space per capita a valuable target to achieve cities' sustainability goals? Romania as a case study [J].
Badiu, Denisa L. ;
Ioja, Cristian I. ;
Patroescu, Maria ;
Breuste, Juergen ;
Artmann, Martina ;
Nita, Mihai R. ;
Gradinaru, Simona R. ;
Hossu, Constantina A. ;
Onose, Diana A. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 70 :53-66