Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: Evidence from repetition effects under task switching

被引:19
作者
Druey, Michel D. [1 ]
Huebner, Ronald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Fachbereich Psychol, Fach D29, D-78457 Constance, Germany
关键词
Repetition effects; Response coding; Task switching; Attention;
D O I
10.1080/17470210701643397
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The coding of stimuli and responses is crucial for human behaviour. Here, we focused primarily on the response codes (or response categories). As a method, we applied a combined dual-task and task-switch paradigm with a fixed task-to-hand mapping. Usually, negative effects (i.e., costs) are observed for response category repetitions under task switching. However, in several previous studies it has been proposed that such repetition effects do not occur, if the stimulus categories (e.g., "odd" if digits have to be classified according to their parity feature) are unequivocally mapped to specific responses. Our aim was to test this hypothesis. In the present experiments, we were able to distinguish between three different types of possible response codes. The results show that the participants generally code their responses according to abstract response features (left/right, or index/middle finger). Moreover, the spatial codes were preferred over the finger-type codes even if the instructions stressed the latter. This preference, though, seemed to result from a stimulus-response feature overlap, so that the spatial response categories were primed by the respective stimulus features. If there was no such overlap, the instructions determined which type of response code was involved in response selection and inhibition.
引用
收藏
页码:1573 / 1600
页数:28
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   The influence of cue type on backward inhibition [J].
Arbuthnott, KD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2005, 31 (05) :1030-1042
[3]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[4]   REPETITION EFFECTS WITH CATEGORIZABLE STIMULUS AND RESPONSE SETS [J].
CAMPBELL, KC ;
PROCTOR, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (06) :1345-1362
[5]   Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes [J].
Cohen, A ;
Shoup, R .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 32 (02) :128-181
[6]   ATTENTION, AUTOMATICITY, AND LEVELS OF REPRESENTATION IN NUMBER PROCESSING [J].
DEHAENE, S ;
AKHAVEIN, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (02) :314-326
[7]   CONDITIONAL AND UNCONDITIONAL AUTOMATICITY - A DUAL-PROCESS MODEL OF EFFECTS OF SPATIAL STIMULUS - RESPONSE CORRESPONDENCE [J].
DEJONG, R ;
LIANG, CC ;
LAUBER, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (04) :731-750
[8]  
DRUEY MD, PSYCHONOMIC IN PRESS
[9]  
DUNCAN J, 1979, J EXP PSYCHOL HUMAN, V5, P216
[10]   Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects [J].
Ellis, R ;
Tucker, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 91 :451-471