Implementing diffusion-weighted MRI for body imaging in prospective multicentre trials: current considerations and future perspectives

被引:46
作者
deSouza, N. M. [1 ,2 ]
Winfield, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Waterton, J. C. [3 ]
Weller, A. [1 ,2 ]
Papoutsaki, M. -V. [1 ,2 ]
Doran, S. J. [1 ,2 ]
Collins, D. J. [1 ,2 ]
Fournier, L. [4 ]
Sullivan, D. [5 ]
Chenevert, T. [6 ]
Jackson, A. [3 ]
Boss, M. [7 ]
Trattnig, S. [8 ]
Liu, Y. [9 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, CRUK Canc Imaging Ctr, Downs Rd, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Downs Rd, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Inst, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Paris 05, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Radiol Dept, Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou,AP HP, Paris, France
[5] Duke Comprehens Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
[6] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] NIST, Appl Phys Div, Boulder, CO USA
[8] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image Guided Therapy, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[9] European Org Res Treatment Canc, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Diffusion-weighted MRI; Multicentre trials; Quality assurance; Quantitation; Standardization; INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION; CELL LUNG-CANCER; COEFFICIENT MEASUREMENT; ADC MEASUREMENTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; ABDOMINAL ORGANS; WATER DIFFUSION; RECTAL-CANCER; SPIN-ECHO;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-017-4972-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For body imaging, diffusion-weighted MRI may be used for tumour detection, staging, prognostic information, assessing response and follow-up. Disease detection and staging involve qualitative, subjective assessment of images, whereas for prognosis, progression or response, quantitative evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is required. Validation and qualification of ADC in multicentre trials involves examination of i) technical performance to determine biomarker bias and reproducibility and ii) biological performance to interrogate a specific aspect of biology or to forecast outcome. Unfortunately, the variety of acquisition and analysis methodologies employed at different centres make ADC values non-comparable between them. This invalidates implementation in multicentre trials and limits utility of ADC as a biomarker. This article reviews the factors contributing to ADC variability in terms of data acquisition and analysis. Hardware and software considerations are discussed when implementing standardised protocols across multi-vendor platforms together with methods for quality assurance and quality control. Processes of data collection, archiving, curation, analysis, central reading and handling incidental findings are considered in the conduct of multicentre trials. Data protection and good clinical practice are essential prerequisites. Developing international consensus of procedures is critical to successful validation if ADC is to become a useful biomarker in oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1118 / 1131
页数:14
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging measurements at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T with and without parallel Imaging [J].
Alexander, AL ;
Lee, JE ;
Wu, YC ;
Field, AS .
NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) :299-+
[2]   Characterization of continuously distributed cortical water diffusion rates with a stretched-exponential model [J].
Bennett, KM ;
Schmainda, KM ;
Bennett, R ;
Rowe, DB ;
Lu, HB ;
Hyde, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (04) :727-734
[3]   Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lung lesions: repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient measurement [J].
Bernardin, L. ;
Douglas, N. H. M. ;
Collins, D. J. ;
Giles, S. L. ;
O'Flynn, E. A. M. ;
Orton, M. ;
deSouza, N. M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (02) :502-511
[4]   Computed Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging May Improve Tumor Detection [J].
Blackledge, Matthew D. ;
Leach, Martin O. ;
Collins, David J. ;
Koh, Dow-Mu .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (02) :573-581
[5]  
Boss MA, 2014, P INT SOC MAGN RESON, V22, P4505
[6]   Information Theoretic Ranking of Four Models of Diffusion Attenuation in Fresh and Fixed Prostate Tissue Ex Vivo [J].
Bourne, Roger M. ;
Panagiotaki, Eleftheria ;
Bongers, Andre ;
Sved, Paul ;
Watson, Geoffrey ;
Alexander, Daniel C. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2014, 72 (05) :1418-1426
[7]   Role of Diffusion MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurement in the Diagnosis, Staging and Pathological Classification of Bladder Tumors [J].
Daggulli, Mansur ;
Onur, Mehmet Ruhi ;
Firdolas, Fatih ;
Onur, Rahmi ;
Kocakoc, Ercan ;
Orhan, Irfan .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 87 (03) :346-352
[8]   Developing a quality control protocol for diffusion imaging on a clinical MRI system [J].
Delakis, I ;
Moore, EM ;
Leach, MO ;
De Wilde, JP .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (08) :1409-1422
[9]   Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Upper Abdominal Organs: Field Strength and Intervendor Variability of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients [J].
Donati, Olivio F. ;
Chong, Daniel ;
Nanz, Daniel ;
Boss, Andreas ;
Froehlich, Johannes M. ;
Andres, Erik ;
Seifert, Burkhardt ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (02) :454-463
[10]   Geometric Distortion in Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Prostate-Contributing Factors and Strategies for Improvement [J].
Donato, Francisco, Jr. ;
Costa, Daniel N. ;
Yuan, Qing ;
Rofsky, Neil M. ;
Lenkinski, Robert E. ;
Pedrosa, Ivan .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) :817-823