Are impairments in emotion recognition a core feature of callous-unemotional traits? Testing the primary versus secondary variants model in children

被引:59
作者
Dadds, Mark R. [1 ]
Kimonis, Eva R. [2 ]
Schollar-Root, Olivia [1 ]
Moul, Caroline [1 ]
Hawes, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
ANTISOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; CONDUCT PROBLEMS; JUVENILE PSYCHOPATHY; MALTREATED CHILDREN; CHILDHOOD ABUSE; EXPRESSIONS; ATTENTION; DISORDER; DEFICITS; FEAR;
D O I
10.1017/S0954579417000475
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The role of environmental adversity in the development of high callous-unemotional (CU) traits in children is controversial. Evidence speaks to the traits being largely independent of adversity; however, recent data shows that those with high CU traits and high adversity and/or high anxiety might differ in important ways from those with no such history. We tested this using emotion recognition (ER) skills. We tested whether maltreatment history and anxiety levels moderated the relationship between level of CU traits and ER skills in N = 364 children with behavioral problems who were 3 to 16 years old. As hypothesised, in the full sample, the relationship between CU traits and ER differed according to maltreatment history, such that CU traits were associated with poorer recognition for those with zero or negligible history of maltreatment. This moderation of the CU-ER relationship by maltreatment was inconsistent across subgroups, however, and for the cohort utilizing youth self-report of maltreatment, high CU traits were associated with poor ER in those with lower anxiety levels. Maltreatment history and/or anxiety levels can identify different emotional impairments associated with high CU traits, and the impairments might be characteristic of primary high CU traits defined as occurring independently of maltreatment and/or high anxiety.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EUR J PSYCHOL ASSESS, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00032-000
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INF PAP INTR SOC IND
[4]  
[Anonymous], UNSW FACIAL EM UNPUB
[5]  
Armstrong GregJ., 2008, Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, V8, P294
[6]  
Barnett D., 1993, ADV APPL DEV PSYCHOL
[7]   Abuse and neglect in childhood: Relationship to personality disorder diagnoses [J].
Bierer, LM ;
Yehuda, R ;
Schmeidler, J ;
Mitropoulou, V ;
New, AS ;
Silverman, JM ;
Siever, LJ .
CNS SPECTRUMS, 2003, 8 (10) :737-+
[8]   Neural mechanisms underlying selective attention to threat [J].
Bishop, Sonia J. .
MOLECULAR AND BIOPHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF AROUSAL, ALERTNESS, AND ATTENTION, 2008, 1129 :141-152
[9]   Conduct Disorder and Callous-Unemotional Traits in Youth [J].
Blair, R. James R. ;
Leibenluft, Ellen ;
Pine, Daniel S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (23) :2207-2216
[10]  
BRESLAU N, 1991, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V48, P216