Corporate multistate tax planning: benefits of multiple jurisdictions

被引:46
作者
Gupta, S
Mills, LF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Business & Publ Adm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Coll Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
multistate taxation; apportionment; cross-jurisdiction; compliance;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00045-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate how firms use differences in state income tax regimes to lower their state tax burdens. We develop a model that predicts that firms' state effective tax rates first decrease then increase as a function of the number of states in which they file returns. Using firm-level data, we find evidence consistent with the model's predictions and we estimate that such rates are minimized at 24 states. Consistent with predictions from prior literature, our evidence also suggests that firms use sales factor apportionment to reduce state tax burdens. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 139
页数:23
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   The weighting game: Formula apportionment as an instrument of public policy [J].
Anand, BN ;
Sansing, R .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2000, 53 (02) :183-199
[2]  
BOUCHER K, 1993, J STATE TAXATION, V12, P23
[3]  
*CAL FRANCH TAX BO, 1999, 1997 ANN REP
[4]  
*CCH, 1999, CCH MULT CORP INC TA
[5]   Global organizations and taxes: An analysis of the dividend, interest, royalty, and management fee payments between US multinationals' foreign affiliates [J].
Collins, JH ;
Shackelford, DA .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1997, 24 (02) :151-173
[6]  
Erickson MM, 1998, ACCOUNT REV, V73, P435
[7]   Coveting thy neighbor's manufacturing: the dilemma of state income apportionment [J].
Goolsbee, A ;
Maydew, EL .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2000, 75 (01) :125-143
[8]   Rewarding creativity in conserving biodiversity in the third world: Can intellectual property rights serve the needs of contemporary and traditional knowledge experts and communities in the third world? [J].
Gupta, AK .
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 1997, 16 (01) :1-9
[9]  
GUPTA S, 2001, EFFECT STATE INCOME
[10]  
GUPTA S, 2001, DETERMINANTS STATE I