Differences in social relations between persons with type 2 diabetes and the general population

被引:12
作者
Hempler, Nana Folmann [1 ]
Ekholm, Ola [2 ]
Willaing, Ingrid [1 ]
机构
[1] Steno Diabet Ctr, Steno Hlth Promot Ctr, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Odense, Denmark
关键词
educational level; general population; persons with type 2 diabetes; social network; social relations; social support; SELF-MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; HEALTH; LONELINESS; BEHAVIOR; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1177/1403494813482535
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: Poor social support and lack of social network are well-established risk factors for morbidity and mortality in general populations. Good social relations, such as social support and network contacts, are associated with better self-management and fewer psychosocial problems in persons with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether persons with type 2 diabetes have poorer social relations than the general population. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in three settings: a specialist diabetes clinic (SDC) (n = 1084), a web panel (WP) consisting of persons with type 2 diabetes (n = 1491) and a sample from the 2010 Danish Health and Morbidity Survey, representative of the general population (n = 15,165). We compared social relations using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Compared to the general population, persons with type 2 diabetes more often lived without a partner (SDC, OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.49-2.06; WP, OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.43-1.87), met with family less than once a month (SDC, OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.40-2.27; WP, OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.94-2.84) and were less certain they could count on help from others in case of illness (WP, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.41). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that persons with type 2 diabetes have poorer social relations than the general population. From a public health point of view, special attention is needed with regards to strengthening existing networks and establishing alternative networks among persons with type 2 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 343
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Health behaviour social integration, perceived health and dysfunction. A comparison between patients with type I and II diabetes and controls [J].
Aalto, AM ;
Uutela, A ;
Kangas, T .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (04) :272-281
[2]   Lack of Social Support in the Etiology and the Prognosis of Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Barth, Juergen ;
Schneider, Sarah ;
von Kaenel, Roland .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2010, 72 (03) :229-238
[3]  
Christensen A.I., 2012, Sundhed og sygelighed i Danmark 2010 - og udviklingen siden 1987
[4]   The Danish National Health Survey 2010. Study design and respondent characteristics [J].
Christensen, Anne Illemann ;
Ekholm, Ola ;
Glumer, Charlotte ;
Andreasen, Anne Helms ;
Hvidberg, Michael Falk ;
Kristensen, Peter Lund ;
Larsen, Finn Breinholt ;
Ortiz, Britta ;
Juel, Knud .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 40 (04) :391-397
[5]   Social relations: network, support and relational strain [J].
Due, P ;
Holstein, B ;
Lund, R ;
Modvig, J ;
Avlund, K .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (05) :661-673
[6]   The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions for research [J].
Gallant, MP .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2003, 30 (02) :170-195
[7]   Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review [J].
Holt-Lunstad, Julianne ;
Smith, Timothy B. ;
Layton, J. Bradley .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (07)
[8]   LONELINESS, SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND MORTALITY: 18 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP [J].
Iecovich, Esther ;
Jacobs, Jeremy M. ;
Stessman, Jochanan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 72 (03) :243-263
[9]  
NAESS S, 1995, SCAND J SOC MED, V23, P179
[10]   Social network, social support, and loneliness in older persons with different chronic diseases [J].
Penninx, BWJH ;
van Tilburg, T ;
Kriegsman, DMW ;
Boeke, AJP ;
Deeg, DJH ;
van Eijk, JTM .
JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 1999, 11 (02) :151-168