Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage?

被引:58
作者
Harrison, Christopher J. [1 ]
Konings, Karen D. [2 ]
Molyneux, Adrian [1 ]
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. [3 ]
Wass, Valerie [1 ]
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Keele Univ, Sch Med, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Med, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
MEDICAL-STUDENTS; SEEKING BEHAVIOR; SELF-EFFICACY; MOTIVATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/medu.12209
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Context There is little research into how to deliver summative assessment student feedback effectively. The main aims of this study were to clarify how students engage with feedback in this context and to explore the roles of learning-related characteristics and previous and current performance. Methods A website was developed to deliver feedback about the objective structural clinical examination (OSCE) in various formats: station by station or on skills across stations. In total, 138 students (in the third year out of five) completed a questionnaire about goal orientation, motivation, self-efficacy, control of learning beliefs and attitudes to feedback. Individual website usage was analysed over an 8-week period. Latent class analyses were used to identify profiles of students, based on their use of different aspects of the feedback website. Differences in learning-related student characteristics between profiles were assessed using analyses of variance (anovas). Individual website usage was related to OSCE performance. Results In total, 132 students (95.7%) viewed the website. The number of pages viewed ranged from two to 377 (median 102). Fifty per cent of students engaged comprehensively with the feedback, 27% used it in a minimal manner, whereas a further 23% used it in a more selective way. Students who were comprehensive users of the website scored higher on the value of feedback scale, whereas students who were minimal users scored higher on extrinsic motivation. Higher performing students viewed significantly more web pages showing comparisons with peers than weaker students did. Students who just passed the assessment made least use of the feedback. Conclusions Higher performing students appeared to use the feedback more for positive affirmation than for diagnostic information. Those arguably most in need engaged least. We need to construct feedback after summative assessment in a way that will more effectively engage those students who need the most help.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 744
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J MANAGE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MANUAL PATTERNS ADAP
[3]  
ASHFORD SJ, 1986, ACAD MANAGE J, V29, P465, DOI 10.5465/256219
[4]   Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited [J].
Bandura, A ;
Locke, EA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) :87-99
[5]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[6]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, V5, P7, DOI [10.1080/0969595980050102, DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102]
[7]  
Brookhart S., 2001, ASSESS EDUC, V8, P153, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09695940123775, 10.1080/09695940123775]
[9]   Revisiting Cognitive and Learning Styles in Computer-Assisted Instruction: Not So Useful After All [J].
Cook, David A. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2012, 87 (06) :778-784
[10]  
Dochy F., 2007, RETHINKING ASSESSMEN, P87