The "all-seeing needle" micro-PCNL versus flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower calyceal stones of 2cm

被引:28
作者
Jiang, Kehua [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hongbo [2 ]
Yu, Xiao [1 ]
Chen, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Ye, Zhangqun [1 ]
Yuan, Huixing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Urol, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Hosp Enshi Autonomous Prefecture, Dept Urol, Enshi, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
All-seeing needle; Optical puncture system; Micro-PCNL; FURS; Lower calyceal stones; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; MICROPERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY MICROPERC; POLE RENAL STONES; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; MANAGEMENT; CM; CALCULI; DIAMETER; MINIPERC;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-018-1049-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objectives of the study are to compare the safety and efficacy of all-seeing needle optical puncture system micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (micro-PCNL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) for the treatment of lower calyceal stones of 2cm and to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each. 116 patients in total with lower calyceal stones of 2cm were randomly divided into two equal groups, all-seeing needle optical puncture system micro-PCNL and FURS. In both groups, holmium laser was utilized for lithotripsy. The perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups. Compared to the all-seeing needle micro-PCNL group, the mean operative time was significantly longer in the FURS group (P=0.000). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mean hemoglobin reduction (P=0.087), complications (P=0.731) and LOS (P=0.856). The overall SFR of the all-seeing needle micro-PCNL group and FURS group was 84.5% (49/58) and 79.3% (46/58), respectively, without any significant difference between the groups (P=0.469). For treating lower calyceal stones of 2cm, the all-seeing needle micro-PCNL group had shorter operative time than FURS, while no significant differences between the two groups with respect to mean hemoglobin reduction, complications, LOS and SFR were found.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 206
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results [J].
Albala, DM ;
Assimos, DG ;
Clayman, RV ;
Denstedt, JD ;
Grasso, M ;
Gutierrez-Aceves, J ;
Kahn, RI ;
Leveillee, RJ ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Macaluso, JN ;
Munch, LC ;
Nakada, SY ;
Newman, RC ;
Pearle, MS ;
Preminger, GM ;
Teichman, J ;
Woods, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2072-2080
[2]   Direct Endoscopic Visualization Combined with Ultrasound Guided Access during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Feasibility Study and Comparison to a Conventional Cohort [J].
Alsyouf, Muhannad ;
Arenas, Javier L. ;
Smith, Jason C. ;
Myklak, Kristene ;
Faaborg, Daniel ;
Jang, Michael ;
Olgin, Gaudencio ;
Lehrman, Evan ;
Baldwin, D. Duane .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (01) :227-233
[3]   The "All-Seeing Needle": Initial Results of an Optical Puncture System Confirming Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [J].
Bader, Markus J. ;
Gratzke, Christian ;
Seitz, Michael ;
Sharma, Rajan ;
Stief, Christian G. ;
Desai, Mahesh .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (06) :1054-1059
[4]   Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower-Pole Renal Stones with a Diameter of 15 to 20 mm [J].
Bozkurt, Omer F. ;
Resorlu, Berkan ;
Yildiz, Yildiray ;
Can, Ceren E. ;
Unsal, Ali .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (07) :1131-1135
[5]   Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
De, Shuba ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Kim, Fernando J. ;
Zargar, Homayoun ;
Laydner, Humberto ;
Balsamo, Raffaele ;
Torricelli, Fabio C. ;
Di Palma, Carmine ;
Molina, Wilson R. ;
Monga, Manoj ;
De Sio, Marco .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (01) :125-137
[6]   Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm [J].
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
Ibrahim, Hamdy M. ;
Youssef, Ramy F. ;
Sheir, Khaled Z. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (06) :898-902
[7]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review [J].
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ;
Malpani, Ankur ;
Desai, Mahesh R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 :660-664
[8]   Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Management of Renal Stone Burdens That Measure 2 to 3 cm: A Multi-Institutional Experience [J].
Hyams, Elias S. ;
Munver, Ravi ;
Bird, Vincent G. ;
Uberoi, Jayant ;
Shah, Ojas .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (10) :1583-1588
[9]   A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones [J].
Kandemir, Abdulkadir ;
Guven, Selcuk ;
Balasar, Mehmet ;
Sonmez, Mehmet Giray ;
Taskapu, Hakan ;
Gurbuz, Recai .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (11) :1771-1776
[10]   Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Microperc) in a Two-Year-Old with the 'All-Seeing Needle' [J].
Kaynar, Mehmet ;
Sumer, Alpay ;
Salvarci, Ahmet ;
Tekinarslan, Erdem ;
Cenker, Ali ;
Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Okan .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 91 (02) :239-241