Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis

被引:37
作者
Yu, Changrong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Fac Humanities, Oulu, Finland
关键词
Conversational analytical methodology; Embarrassment; Face-saving; Multimodal interaction analysis; Mutual gaze; Off-record markers; Shared amusement; Self-mockery; Verbal and nonverbal expressions; LAUGHTER; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.006
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This paper uses conversation analytical methodology and multimodal interaction analysis to show how self-mockery is conducted via verbal and nonverbal expressions. The author proposes two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations. The first function is face-saving. This kind of self-mockery is generally expressed following displays of embarrassment, and it involves admitting one's weaknesses or conversational transgressions in relation to the other speakers. In one type of interactional context, self-mockery saves the speaker's own face by helping to overcome momentary embarrassment. In another interactional context, the speakers use self-mockery to save the face of their recipients, by exposing their own weaknesses in comparison with those of their recipients. In such face-saving situations, the recipients usually disaffiliate with the speaker's self-mockery and try to correct it. The second function of self-mockery is to bring shared amusement to a conversation. In this case, the self-mockers put themselves in a humorous light, coordinating their verbal expressions with exaggerated off-record markers (e.g., gestures or prosodic variations). The recipients often play along with such self-mockery, leading to a series of mutually amusing, jocular exchanges. In all these situations, the return of mutual gaze during the course of self-mockery invites responses from the recipients, and plays an important role for both the interactional function of face recovery and jocular exchanges. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, EPISTEMIC STANCE ENG
[2]  
Arundale R., 1999, PRAGMATICS, V9, P119, DOI DOI 10.1075/PRAG.9.1.07ARU
[3]  
Arundale R., 2006, J POLITENESS RES-LAN, V2, P193, DOI [10.1515/PR.2006.011, DOI 10.1515/PR.2006.011]
[4]   Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement [J].
Arundale, Robert B. .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2010, 42 (08) :2078-2105
[5]   Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze [J].
Bavelas, JB ;
Coates, L ;
Johnson, T .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2002, 52 (03) :566-580
[6]  
Chafe W., 1994, Discourse, consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing
[7]   PO-FACED RECEIPTS OF TEASES [J].
DREW, P .
LINGUISTICS, 1987, 25 (01) :219-253
[8]  
Drew P., 2006, Conversation Analysis, pxxi
[9]  
Du Bois J., 1993, Talking data, P45
[10]  
Du Bois John W., 2007, Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, P139, DOI DOI 10.1075/PBNS.164.07DU