Autonomous Vehicles Require Socio-Political Acceptance-An Empirical and Philosophical Perspective on the Problem of Moral Decision Making

被引:43
作者
Bergmann, Lasse T. [1 ]
Schlicht, Larissa [1 ]
Meixner, Carmen [1 ]
Koenig, Peter [1 ]
Pipa, Gordon [1 ]
Boshammer, Susanne [2 ]
Stephan, Achim [1 ]
机构
[1] Osnabruck Univ, Inst Cognit Sci, Osnabruck, Germany
[2] Osnabruck Univ, Inst Philosophy, Osnabruck, Germany
关键词
autonomous vehicles; experimental philosophy; moral cognition; decision making; social acceptance; trolley problems; SELF-SACRIFICE; INTUITIONS; JUDGMENTS; INTENTION; DILEMMAS;
D O I
10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00031
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Autonomous vehicles, though having enormous potential, face a number of challenges. As a computer system interacting with society on a large scale and human beings in particular, they will encounter situations, which require moral assessment. What will count as right behavior in such situations depends on which factors are considered to be both morally justified and socially acceptable. In an empirical study we investigated what factors people recognize as relevant in driving situations. The study put subjects in several "dilemma" situations, which were designed to isolate different and potentially relevant factors. Subjects showed a surprisingly high willingness to sacrifice themselves to save others, took the age of potential victims in a crash into consideration and were willing to swerve onto a sidewalk if this saved more lives. The empirical insights are intended to provide a starting point for a discussion, ultimately yielding societal agreement whereby the empirical insights should be balanced with philosophical considerations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TRAG LOSS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The top 10 causes of death
[3]   NONCONSEQUENTIALIST DECISIONS [J].
BARON, J .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1994, 17 (01) :1-10
[4]  
Bonnefon J.-F., 2015, Autonomous Vehicles Need Experimental Ethics: Are We Ready for Utilitarian Cars?
[5]   The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles [J].
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois ;
Shariff, Azim ;
Rahwan, Iyad .
SCIENCE, 2016, 352 (6293) :1573-1576
[6]   Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation [J].
Borg, Jana Schaich ;
Hynes, Catherine ;
Van Horn, John ;
Grafton, Scott ;
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 18 (05) :803-817
[7]  
Bundesministerium fur Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur ( BMVI ), 2017, ETH KOMM AUT VERN FA
[8]  
CDC National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, NATL ENT DIS SURV LI, P2
[9]   Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review [J].
Christensen, J. F. ;
Gomila, A. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (04) :1249-1264
[10]   Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure [J].
Cushman, Fiery ;
Greene, Joshua D. .
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 7 (03) :269-279