Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:5
作者
Banning, Amerjeet S. [1 ]
Gershlick, Anthony H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Glenfield Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
[2] Glenfield Hosp, Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Dept Cardiol, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
关键词
Myocardial infarction; Primary PCI; Multivessel disease; Complete revascularisation; Non-infarct-related artery; Revascularisation strategy; ADVERSE CARDIAC EVENTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CULPRIT VESSEL; ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; INTERVENTION; ARTERY; ANGIOPLASTY; OUTCOMES; PLAQUES; REPERFUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-015-0632-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Primary PCI of infarct-related arteries is the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Up to 40 % of such patients demonstrate evidence of multivessel, non-infarct-related artery coronary disease. Previous non-randomised observational studies and their associated meta-analyses have suggested that in such cases only the culprit infarct-related artery (IRA) lesion should be treated. However, recent randomised controlled trials have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes with lower major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rates when complete revascularisation is undertaken either at index primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or during index admission. These trials suggest that current guidelines pertaining to treatment of non-infarct-related artery (N-IRA) lesions in STEMI patients with multivessel disease may need to be reconsidered depending on future trials. However, issues remain around timing of N-IRA intervention, the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular imaging to guide intervention in N-IRA lesions and the need to demonstrate reductions in hard clinical endpoints (death and MI) after complete revascularisation; these issues will need to be addressed through future trials. Clinicians must judge on the currently available data, whether it is still safer to leave important stenosis in NIRA untreated.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Initial culprit-only versus initial multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study registry [J].
Abe, Daisuke ;
Sato, Akira ;
Hoshi, Tomoya ;
Takeyasu, Noriyuki ;
Misaki, Masako ;
Hayashi, Mayu ;
Aonuma, Kazutaka .
HEART AND VESSELS, 2014, 29 (02) :171-177
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM COLL CARD I2 SC S
[3]   Complete vs culprit-only revascularization for patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bainey, Kevin R. ;
Mehta, Shamir R. ;
Lai, Tony ;
Welsh, Robert C. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 167 (01) :1-+
[4]   Meta-Analysis of Multivessel Coronary Artery Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease [J].
Bangalore, Sripal ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Poddar, Kanhaiya L. ;
Ramasamy, Sureshkumar ;
Rha, Seung-Woon ;
Faxon, David P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 107 (09) :1300-1310
[5]   EVALUATION OF COMBINATION THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY AND TIMING OF CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - RESULTS OF THROMBOLYSIS AND ANGIOPLASTY IN MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION PHASE-5 RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
CALIFF, RM ;
TOPOL, EJ ;
STACK, RS ;
ELLIS, SG ;
GEORGE, BS ;
KEREIAKES, DJ ;
SAMAHA, JK ;
WORLEY, SJ ;
ANDERSON, JL ;
HARRELSONWOODLIEF, L ;
WALL, TC ;
PHILLIPS, HR ;
ABBOTTSMITH, CW ;
CANDELA, RJ ;
FLANAGAN, WH ;
SASAHARA, AA ;
MANTELL, SJ ;
LEE, KL .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (05) :1543-1556
[6]   Prevalence, Predictors, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Non-Infarct Artery Intervention During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry) [J].
Cavender, Matthew A. ;
Milford-Beland, Sarah ;
Roe, Matthew T. ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Weintraub, William S. ;
Rao, Sunil V. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (04) :507-513
[7]   In-hospital and long-term outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction [J].
Chen, LY ;
Lennon, RJ ;
Grantham, JA ;
Berger, PB ;
Mathew, V ;
Singh, M ;
Holmes, DR ;
Rihal, CS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (03) :349-354
[8]   Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction [J].
Corpus, RA ;
House, JA ;
Marso, SP ;
Grantham, A ;
Huber, KC ;
Laster, SB ;
Johnson, WL ;
Daniels, WC ;
Barth, CW ;
Giorgi, LV ;
Rutherford, BD .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 148 (03) :493-500
[9]  
Dambrink JHE, 2010, EUROINTERVENTION, V5, P968, DOI 10.4244/
[10]   Impact of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and Noninfarct-Related Artery Revascularization on Outcome of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER Registry) [J].
Dziewierz, Artur ;
Siudak, Zbigniew ;
Rakowski, Tomasz ;
Zasada, Wojciech ;
Dubiel, Jacek S. ;
Dudek, Dariusz .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (03) :342-347