LRFD Calibration for Steel Strip Reinforced Soil Walls

被引:32
作者
Huang, Bingquan [2 ,3 ]
Bathurst, Richard J. [1 ]
Allen, Tony M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Mil Coll Canada, GeoEngn Ctr Queens RMC, Dept Civil Engn, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada
[2] AMEC Earth & Environm, Edmonton, AB T6B 3P6, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, GeoEngn Ctr Queens RMC, Dept Civil Engn, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[4] Washington State Dept Transportat, State Mat Lab, Olympia, WA 98504 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Retaining walls; Steel reinforcement; Load and resistance factor design; Reliability; Pullout; Yield; LIMIT STATES DESIGN; FOUNDATIONS; LOADS; CODE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000665
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The paper reports the results of load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for pullout and yield limit states for steel strip reinforced soil walls under self-weight loading. An important feature of the calibration method is the use of bias statistics to account for prediction accuracy of the underlying deterministic models for reinforcement load, pullout capacity and yield strength of the steel strips, and random variability in input parameters. To improve the accuracy of reinforcement load predictions, small adjustments to current semiempirical American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) load design charts are proposed. Similarly, current empirical-based design charts found in AASHTO and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidance documents for the estimation of the pullout resistance factor for smooth and ribbed steel strips are adjusted to improve the accuracy of pullout capacity predictions. The results of calibration lead to a load factor of 1.35 that is consistent with current practice and resistance factors that together give a consistent probability of failure of 1% for all three limit states considered. Furthermore, comparison with allowable stress design (ASD) past practice (AASHTO simplified method) shows that the operational factors of safety using a rigorous LRFD approach give the same or higher factors of safety and lower probabilities of failure. In this study, data for steel strip reinforced soil walls are used as an example to illustrate rigorous reliability theory-based LRFD calibration concepts. However, the general approach is applicable to other reinforced soil wall technologies and calibration outcomes can be updated as more data become available. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000665. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 933
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Allen T.M., 2005, CALIBRATION DETERMIN
[2]   New method for prediction of loads in steel reinforced soil walls [J].
Allen, TM ;
Bathurst, RJ ;
Holtz, RD ;
Lee, WF ;
Walters, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (11) :1109-1120
[3]  
[Anonymous], P ASCE C DES PERF EA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, LRFD bridge design specifications
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, S606 CSA
[6]  
[Anonymous], P INT WORKSH FDN DES
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1966, Applied regression analysis
[8]  
[Anonymous], REINF EARTH CO RECO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
[10]  
[Anonymous], 05052 FHWANHI