Signs and symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome type I/Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: Judgment of the physician versus objective measurement

被引:26
作者
Oerlemans, HM
Oostendorp, RAB
de Boo, T
Perez, RSGM
Goris, RJA
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen Hosp, Allied Hlth Serv 111, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Dutch Natl Inst Allied Hlth Profess, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Free Univ Brussels, Dept Manual Therapy, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Catholic Univ Nijmegen, Dept Med Stat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Nijmegen Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
reflex sympathetic dystrophy; complex regional pain syndrome type I; signs and symptoms;
D O I
10.1097/00002508-199909000-00010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the relation between the subjectively assessed and objectively measured diagnostic signs and symptoms in complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) and to quantify their severity. Design: Diagnostic signs and symptoms were recorded in patients suffering from CRPS I of one upper extremity for less than 1 year. Independent assessors measured (a) pain by using four visual analog scales (VAS) and the McGill Questionnaire list of adjectives (MPQ), (b) edema with a hand volumeter, (c) skin temperature with an infrared thermometer, and (d) active range of motion (AROM) with goniometers. Setting: Two university hospitals. Patients: Ninety-five women and 40 men with CRPS I of one upper extremity. Results: Four signs and symptoms were diagnosed in 50 patients, and five in the remaining 85 patients, The mean score for present pain intensity was 31.5 mm and that for pain resulting from exertion of the affected extremity was 71.9 mm. A median of 11.5 words was chosen from the MPQ, with the highest number from its evaluative part. The difference in volume between both hands was 30.4 ml. The mean difference in temperature between the two hands was 0.78 degrees C dorsally and 0.66 degrees C palmarly. The largest decrease in mobility was seen in the wrist and fingers; the thumb was relatively less affected and the little finger relatively more affected than the other fingers. Conclusions: Bedside evaluation of CRPS I with Veldman's criteria was in good accord with psychometric or laboratory testing of these criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 232
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Adams L, 1992, Clinical Assessment Recommendations, V2, P55
[2]  
*AM SOC HAND THER, 1992, CLIN ASS REC
[3]   REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY SYNDROME - CONSENSUS REPORT OF AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN-ASSOCIATION-FOR-HAND-SURGERY ON THE DEFINITION OF REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY SYNDROME [J].
AMADIO, PC ;
MACKINNON, SE ;
MERRITT, WH ;
BRODY, GS ;
TERZIS, JK .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1991, 87 (02) :371-375
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, J Hand Ther
[5]   USING MEMORY FOR PAIN IN ANALGESIC RESEARCH [J].
BABUL, N ;
DARKE, AC ;
JOHNSON, DH ;
CHARRONVINCENT, K .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1993, 27 (01) :9-12
[6]  
BLUMBERG H, 1991, PAIN RES CL, V4, P399
[7]   Validation of thermography in the diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy [J].
Bruehl, S ;
Lubenow, TR ;
Nath, H ;
Ivankovich, O .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1996, 12 (04) :316-325
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN .1. ASPECTS OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE [J].
CARLSSON, AM .
PAIN, 1983, 16 (01) :87-101
[9]  
COOKE ED, 1989, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V28, P399
[10]   PAIN MEASUREMENT IN REFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY SYNDROME [J].
DAVIDOFF, G ;
MOREY, K ;
AMANN, M ;
STAMPS, J .
PAIN, 1988, 32 (01) :27-34