Revised 15-item Glasgow Benefit Inventory with five factors based on analysis of a large population study of medical and surgical otorhinolaryngological interventions

被引:11
作者
Browning, George G. [1 ]
Kubba, Haytham [1 ]
Whitmer, William M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Glasgow Royal Infirm, Hearing Sci Scottish Sect, 10-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
hearing aids; outcome measures; quality of life; tonsillectomy;
D O I
10.1111/coa.13649
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives To review, using confirmatory factor analysis, the widely used 18-question Glasgow Benefit Inventory [GBI] that has three factors. Thereafter to develop, using exploratory factor analysis, a more coherent, revised version of the GBI. Design Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis of a large national GBI data set of ORL interventions. Setting Adult otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinics in six University Hospital departments. Participants One thousand nine hundred eighty adult patients who had complete GBI data and who underwent an active (medical or surgical) intervention, out of the total data set of 9005 patients from the original Scottish ENT Outcome Study [SENTOS]. Results One of the 18 questions was discarded from the data base because it was not answered by 8% of respondents. Two of the original factors remained (Physical Health, renamedGeneral Health,and Social Support, renamedSupport). The General factor was split into three new factors (Quality of Life, Self-ConfidenceandSocial Involvement). The three new factors were found to give additional information regarding the area of benefit. This reduced number of questions does not make any material difference to the results of the >196 existing GBI papers in the literature. Conclusion A 15-question GBI with five factors is provided that is more explanatory of the areas of benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 221
页数:9
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research [J].
Fabrigar, LR ;
Wegener, DT ;
MacCallum, RC ;
Strahan, EJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 4 (03) :272-299
[2]   The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure [J].
Hendry, J. ;
Chin, A. ;
Swan, I. R. C. ;
Akeroyd, M. A. ;
Browning, G. G. .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 41 (03) :259-275
[3]  
Jenkinson C, 1997, J Health Serv Res Policy, V2, P14
[4]   Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy [J].
Robinson, K ;
Gatehouse, S ;
Browning, GG .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1996, 105 (06) :415-422
[5]   Health-related quality of life before and after management in adults referred to otolaryngology: a prospective national study [J].
Swan, I. R. C. ;
Akeroyd, F. H. ;
Akeroyd, M. A. .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 37 (01) :35-43
[6]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION [J].
WARE, JE ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :473-483