An improved approach for water quality evaluation: TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking (TIWR) approach

被引:71
作者
Li, Zhenya [1 ]
Yang, Tao [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Ching-Sheng [1 ]
Xu, Chong-Yu [3 ]
Shao, Quanxi [4 ]
Shi, Pengfei [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Cui, Tong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Urumqi, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, POB 1047, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[4] CSIRO, Computat Informat, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water quality evaluation; TOPSIS; TIWR approach; CRITIC approach; FUZZY SYNTHETIC EVALUATION; SURFACE-WATER; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIVER-BASIN; SELECTION; CHINA; GROUNDWATER; POLLUTION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.014
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A great deal of effort has been made on the development of approaches based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Little attention is, however, paid to how to couple water quality indicators and their officially -defined standards with consideration of inter-correlation among indicators when TOPSIS is applied for evaluating water quality. This study proposes an improved TOPSIS-based approach called the Informative Weighting and Ranking (TIWR) approach. It couples water quality indicators and associated standards over the entire process and considers inter-correlation among indicators using the Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) approach. The approach is applied to the water quality evaluations of the Shitoumenkou reservoir and the Lake Tai. Results suggest that it produces a delicate level associated with water quality for an object/monitoring site, which avoids classifying several objects into the same typical level and makes them distinguishable. The TIWR approach agrees well with traditional approach when a level Hi is transformed to a typical level. In addition, it can avoid some unreasonable results obtained by traditional approach. These findings have implications for decision makers and researchers in applying the TIWR approach in water environment protection and management.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 364
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   A "toolbox" for biological and chemical monitoring requirements for the European Union's Water Framework Directive [J].
Allan, IJ ;
Vrana, B ;
Greenwood, R ;
Mills, GA ;
Roig, B ;
Gonzalez, C .
TALANTA, 2006, 69 (02) :302-322
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ENV QUALITY STANDARD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SCI REP
[4]   Spatial and Temporal Correlation of Water Quality Parameters of Produced Waters from Devonian-Age Shale following Hydraulic Fracturing [J].
Barbot, Elise ;
Vidic, Natasa S. ;
Gregory, Kelvin B. ;
Vidic, Radisav D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (06) :2562-2569
[5]   Using principal component analysis to monitor spatial and temporal changes in water quality [J].
Bengraïne, K ;
Marhaba, TF .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2003, 100 (1-3) :179-195
[6]   A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method [J].
Boran, Fatih Emre ;
Genc, Serkan ;
Kurt, Mustafa ;
Akay, Diyar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (08) :11363-11368
[7]   A water quality index applied to an international shared river basin: The case of the douro river [J].
Bordalo, Adriano A. ;
Teixeira, Rita ;
Wiebe, William J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 38 (06) :910-920
[8]   Identification of river water quality using the Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation approach [J].
Chang, NB ;
Chen, HW ;
Ning, SK .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 63 (03) :293-305
[9]  
Chow-Fraser P., 2006, Coastal wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes: health, habitat and indicators, P137
[10]   A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection [J].
Chu, TC ;
Lin, YC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (04) :284-290