Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness

被引:95
作者
Svensson, Mikael [1 ]
Nilsson, Fredrik O. L. [2 ]
Arnberg, Karl [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orebro, Dept Econ, S-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Dent & Pharmaceut Benefits Agcy TLV, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
COVERAGE DECISIONS; AUSTRALIA; NICE; THRESHOLD; CANADA;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-015-0307-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV) is the government body responsible for deciding whether outpatient drugs are to be included in the pharmaceutical benefits scheme. This paper analyzes the impact of cost effectiveness and severity of disease on reimbursement decisions for new pharmaceuticals. Data has been extracted from all decisions made by the TLV between 2005 and 2011. Cost effectiveness is measured as the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, whereas disease severity is a binary variable (severe-not severe). In total, the dataset consists of 102 decisions, with 86 approved and 16 declined reimbursements. The lowest cost per QALY of declined reimbursements is Swedish kronor (SEK) 700,000 (a,not sign79,100), while the highest cost per QALY of approved reimbursements is SEK1,220,000 (a,not sign135,600). At a cost per QALY of SEK702,000 Swedish kronor (non-severe diseases) and SEK988,000 (severe diseases), the likelihood of approval is estimated to be 50/50 (a,not sign79,400 and a,not sign111,700). The TLV places substantial weight on both the cost effectiveness and the severity of disease in reimbursement decisions, and the implied willingness to pay for a QALY is higher than the often cited 'rule of thumb' in Swedish policy debates.
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1236
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: Do health-economic evaluations support decision making?
    Anell A.
    Persson U.
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2005, 6 (3) : 274 - 279
  • [2] Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE
    Baker, Rachel
    Chilton, Sue
    Donaldson, Cam
    Jones-Lee, Michael
    Lancsar, Emily
    Mason, Helen
    Metcalf, Hugh
    Pennington, Mark
    Wildman, John
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2011, 6 (04) : 435 - 447
  • [3] Cerri K, 2013, HEALTH ECON POLICY L, P1
  • [4] Using Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness to Make Drug Coverage Decisions A Comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada
    Clement, Fiona M.
    Harris, Anthony
    Li, Jing Jing
    Yong, Karen
    Lee, Karen M.
    Manns, Braden J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (13): : 1437 - 1443
  • [5] Coast J, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P243, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00147.x
  • [6] Dakin HA, 2013, 93 CHE U YORK
  • [7] THE INFLUENCE OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND OTHER FACTORS ON NICE DECISIONS
    Dakin, Helen
    Devlin, Nancy
    Feng, Yan
    Rice, Nigel
    O'Neill, Phill
    Parkin, David
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 24 (10) : 1256 - 1271
  • [8] Yes No" or "Yes, but"? Multinomial modelling of NICE decision-making
    Dakin, Helen Angela
    Devlin, Nancy J.
    Odeyemi, Isaac A. O.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2006, 77 (03) : 352 - 367
  • [9] VALUE-BASED DIFFERENTIAL PRICING: EFFICIENT PRICES FOR DRUGS IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT
    Danzon, Patricia
    Towse, Adrian
    Mestre-Ferrandiz, Jorge
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 24 (03) : 294 - 301
  • [10] Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis
    Devlin, N
    Parkin, D
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (05) : 437 - 452