Measuring Attitudes Toward Distributive Justice: The Basic Social Justice Orientations Scale

被引:51
作者
Huelle, Sebastian [1 ]
Liebig, Stefan [1 ]
May, Meike Janina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, Fac Sociol, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
Social justice; Justice attitudes; Distributive justice; Justice ideologies; Attitude measurement; Survey research; INEQUALITY; MULTILEVEL; INEQUITY; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-017-1580-x
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Previous research on social inequalities relied primarily on objective indicators. According to recent studies, however, subjective indicators that reflect a person's perceptions and evaluations of inequalities are also relevant. Such evaluations depend on an individual's normative orientation, so respective attitudes toward distributive justice need to be accounted for appropriately. This article introduces a short scale for measuring such order-related justice attitudes. The introduced Basic Social Justice Orientations (BSJO) scale comprises current insights into the empirical justice research and measures individuals' attitudes toward the following four basic distributive principles: equality, need, equity, and entitlement. The BSJO scale has four dimensions that measure support for these four justice principles on the basis of eight items. We assess the quality of the scale using data from three general population surveys conducted in Germany: the first wave of the panel "Legitimation of Inequality Over the Life Span" (LINOS-1), the Innovation Sample of the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP-IS 2012), and the German General Social Survey (ALLBUS 2014). The scale was found to be a valid instrument that can be used to measure order-related justice attitudes toward distributive justice. The BSJO scale is a short and therefore time-efficient instrument that can be implemented in general population surveys.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 692
页数:30
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY [J].
ADAMS, JS .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 67 (05) :422-&
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Changing Inequalities in Rich Countries: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, IT TOG WHY LESS IN B
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SOC JUSTICE RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Psychometric theory
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PSYCHOL DIAGNOSTIK G
[7]   Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter? [J].
Arts, W ;
Gelissen, J .
ACTA SOCIOLOGICA, 2001, 44 (04) :283-299
[8]  
Atkinson AnthonyB., 2015, Handbook of Income Distribution, V2
[9]   DOES ITEM HOMOGENEITY INDICATE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OR ITEM REDUNDANCY IN PSYCHOMETRIC SCALES [J].
BOYLE, GJ .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1991, 12 (03) :291-294
[10]  
Clark A. E., 2015, HDB INCOME DISTRIBUT, V2, P1147, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00014-X, 10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00014-X]