CoSpace: Common Subspace Learning From Hyperspectral-Multispectral Correspondences

被引:199
作者
Hong, Danfeng [1 ,2 ]
Yokoya, Naoto [3 ]
Chanussot, Jocelyn [4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Xiao Xiang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr, Remote Sensing Technol Inst IMF, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Signal Proc Earth Observat, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[3] RIKEN, Geoinformat Unit, RIKEN Ctr Adv Intelligence Project, Tokyo 1030027, Japan
[4] Univ Grenoble Alpes, GIPSA Lab, CNRS, Grenoble INT, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[5] Univ Iceland, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2019年 / 57卷 / 07期
关键词
Common subspace learning (CoSpace); cross-modality learning; hyperspectral; landcover classification; multispectral (MS); remote sensing; FUSION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2018.2890705
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
With a large amount of open satellite multispectral (MS) imagery (e.g., Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8), considerable attention has been paid to global MS land cover classification. However, its limited spectral information hinders further improving the classification performance. Hyperspectral imaging enables discrimination between spectrally similar classes but its swath width from space is narrow compared to MS ones. To achieve accurate land cover classification over a large coverage, we propose a cross-modality feature learning framework, called common subspace learning (CoSpace), by jointly considering subspace learning and supervised classification. By locally aligning the manifold structure of the two modalities, CoSpace linearly learns a shared latent subspace from hyperspectral-MS (HS-MS) correspondences. The MS out-of-samples can be then projected into the subspace, which are expected to take advantages of rich spectral information of the corresponding hyperspectral data used for learning, and thus leads to a better classification. Extensive experiments on two simulated HS-MS data sets (University of Houston and Chikusei), where HS-MS data sets have tradeoffs between coverage and spectral resolution, are performed to demonstrate the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed method in comparison with previous state-of-the-art methods.
引用
收藏
页码:4349 / 4359
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, PROC EUR C COMPUT VI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
[3]  
[Anonymous], MANIFOLD LEARNING TH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SAL20160527 U TOK
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, P 21 ACM SIGGRAPH S
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   Deep Fusion of Remote Sensing Data for Accurate Classification [J].
Chen, Yushi ;
Li, Chunyang ;
Ghamisi, Pedram ;
Jia, Xiuping ;
Gu, Yanfeng .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2017, 14 (08) :1253-1257
[9]   Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Fusion: Outcome of the 2013 GRSS Data Fusion Contest [J].
Debes, Christian ;
Merentitis, Andreas ;
Heremans, Roel ;
Hahn, Juergen ;
Frangiadakis, Nikolaos ;
van Kasteren, Tim ;
Liao, Wenzhi ;
Bellens, Rik ;
Pizurica, Aleksandra ;
Gautama, Sidharta ;
Philips, Wilfried ;
Prasad, Saurabh ;
Du, Qian ;
Pacifici, Fabio .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 7 (06) :2405-2418
[10]   Fusion of Difference Images for Change Detection Over Urban Areas [J].
Du, Peijun ;
Liu, Sicong ;
Gamba, Paolo ;
Tan, Kun ;
Xia, Junshi .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 5 (04) :1076-1086