Risk and protective factors in gifted children with dyslexia

被引:27
|
作者
van Viersen, Sietske [1 ,2 ]
de Bree, Elise H. [1 ]
Kroesbergen, Evelyn H. [2 ]
Slot, Esther M. [2 ]
de Jong, Peter F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Res Inst Child Dev & Educ, NL-1001 NG Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Pedag & Educ Sci, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Bayesian statistics; Case series; Dyslexia; Giftedness; Literacy; Risk/protective factors; MULTIPLE DEFICIT MODELS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; BAYES FACTORS; STUDENTS; SPEED; COMPENSATION; INEQUALITY; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11881-015-0106-y
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This study investigated risk and protective factors associated with dyslexia and literacy development, both at the group and individual level, to gain more insight in underlying cognitive profiles and possibilities for compensation in high-IQ children. A sample of 73 Dutch primary school children included a dyslexic group, a gifted-dyslexic group, and a borderline-dyslexic group (i.e., gifted children with relative literacy problems). Children were assessed on literacy, phonology, language, and working memory. Competing hypotheses were formulated, comparing the core-deficit view to the twice-exceptionality view on compensation with giftedness-related strengths. The results showed no indication of compensation of dyslexia-related deficits by giftedness-related strengths in gifted children with dyslexia. The higher literacy levels of borderline children compared to gifted children with dyslexia seemed the result of both fewer combinations of risk factors and less severe phonological deficits in this group. There was no evidence for compensation by specific strengths more relevant to literacy development in the borderline group. Accordingly, the findings largely supported the core-deficit view, whereas no evidence for the twice-exceptionality view was found. Besides practical implications, the findings also add to knowledge about the different manifestations of dyslexia and associated underlying cognitive factors at the higher end of the intelligence spectrum.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 198
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk and protective factors in gifted children with dyslexia
    Sietske van Viersen
    Elise H. de Bree
    Evelyn H. Kroesbergen
    Esther M. Slot
    Peter F. de Jong
    Annals of Dyslexia, 2015, 65 : 178 - 198
  • [2] Understanding of the prevalence of depression in a sample of gifted children by identifying the developmental trajectory of risk and protective factors
    Vaivre-Douret, L.
    Hamdioui, S.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 64 : S86 - S87
  • [3] Consequences of Risk Factors in the Development of Gifted Children
    Abd. Majid, Rosadah
    Alias, Aliza
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNER DIVERSITY 2010, 2010, 7 : 63 - 69
  • [4] Risk Factors of Dyslexia in Pre-School Children
    Tubele, Sarmite
    SOCIETY, INTEGRATION, EDUCATION, 2015, VOL III, 2015, : 238 - 247
  • [5] High Reading Skills Mask Dyslexia in Gifted Children
    van Viersen, Sietske
    Kroesbergen, Evelyn H.
    Slot, Esther M.
    de Bree, Elise H.
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2016, 49 (02) : 189 - 199
  • [6] Gifted children or children at risk?
    Gendrel, D
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2006, 35 (01): : 84 - 85
  • [7] Protective Factors and Compensation in Resolving Dyslexia
    van Viersen, Sietske
    de Bree, Elise H.
    de Jong, Peter F.
    SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2019, 23 (06) : 461 - 477
  • [8] Differences Between Children With Dyslexia Who Are and Are Not Gifted in Verbal Reasoning
    Berninger, Virginia W.
    Abbott, Robert D.
    GIFTED CHILD QUARTERLY, 2013, 57 (04) : 223 - 233
  • [9] Analysis of WISC-III profile of gifted children with dyslexia
    Portesova, Sarka
    Cihounkova, Jana
    Jancova, Petra
    Budikova, Marie
    CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 2008, 52 (04): : 338 - 350
  • [10] Reading Teaching for Children with Dyslexia and at Risk of Dyslexia
    Martins Yamaura, Luciana Parisi
    Haydu, Veronica Bender
    REVISTA CES PSICOLOGIA, 2021, 14 (02): : 89 - 117