Life cycle assessment of fisheries: A review for fisheries scientists and managers

被引:113
|
作者
Avadí, Angel [1 ]
Freon, Pierre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 2, IRD, Ctr Rech Halieut Mediterraneenne & Tropicale, UMR EME 212, F-34203 Sete, France
[2] Ctr Rech Halieut Mediterraneenne & Tropicale, IRD, UMR EME 212, F-34203 Sete, France
关键词
Allocation; Energy; Environmental impacts; Fisheries; Life cycle assessment; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; CONSEQUENTIAL LCA; CO-PRODUCT; ALLOCATION; IMPACT; NORMALIZATION; SYSTEMS; TOOLS; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fishres.2013.01.006
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
This review aims to synthesise and discuss current literature applying the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework for the environmental assessment of fisheries. The review introduces and illustrates the LCA framework, and highlights energy use by fishing vessels, among other key factors determining environmental impacts of fisheries operations. Moreover, the review concludes with recommendations on future developments of LCA in the fisheries and seafood sectors. We reviewed 16 studies on LCA applied to fisheries, with perspectives from a few additional publications on closely related topics. The main Aspects considered in the ad hoc comparison of studies include: scope and system boundaries, functional units, allocation strategies for co-products, conventional and fishery-specific impact categories used, fuel use, impact assessment methods, level of detail in inventories, normalisation of results and sensitivity analyses. A number of patterns and singularities were detected. Fishery-specific impact categories, despite not being standardised, and fuel use in fishing operations were identified as the main contributors to environmental impacts. Energy efficiency was found to be strongly related to the fishing gear used. Several studies discussed the impacts of antifouling substances and metals use. The need for standardisation of fisheries LCA research is justified and ideas on how to do so and what elements to standardise (fisheries-specific impact categories, inventory details, normalisation references, etc.) are discussed. Finally, fisheries LCA constitute a useful research field when studying the sustainability of seafood and fisheries-based agrifood, and it should likewise contribute to an ecosystem approach to fisheries. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 38
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment in the plastic sector: A systematic literature review
    Marson, Alessandro
    Piron, Mirco
    Zuliani, Filippo
    Fedele, Andrea
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 9
  • [22] Review of Emergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment: Coupling Development Perspective
    Wang, Qingsong
    Xiao, Hongkun
    Ma, Qiao
    Yuan, Xueliang
    Zuo, Jian
    Zhang, Jian
    Wang, Shuguang
    Wang, Mansen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [23] Best practices in life cycle assessment implementation in fisheries. Improving and broadening environmental assessment for seafood production systems
    Vazquez-Rowe, Ian
    Hospido, Almudena
    Teresa Moreira, Ma.
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 28 (02) : 116 - 131
  • [24] Food for thought from French scientists for a revised EU Common Fisheries Policy to protect marine ecosystems and enhance fisheries performance
    Drouineau, Hilaire
    Moullec, Fabien
    Gascuel, Didier
    Laloe, Francis
    Lucas, Sterenn
    Bez, Nicolas
    Guillotreau, Patrice
    Guitton, Jerome
    Hernvann, Pierre-Yves
    Huret, Martin
    Lehuta, Sigrid
    Leopold, Marc
    Mahevas, Stephanie
    Robert, Marianne
    Woillez, Mathieu
    Vermard, Youen
    MARINE POLICY, 2023, 148
  • [25] Carbon footprint of marine fisheries: life cycle analysis from Visakhapatnam
    Ghosh, Shubhadeep
    Rao, M. V. Hanumantha
    Kumar, M. Satish
    Mahesh, V. Uma
    Muktha, M.
    Zacharia, P. U.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2014, 107 (03): : 515 - 521
  • [26] Review of current practices of life cycle assessment in electric mobility: A first step towards method harmonization
    Eltohamy, Hazem
    van Oers, Lauran
    Lindholm, Julia
    Raugei, Marco
    Lokesh, Kadambari
    Baars, Joris
    Husmann, Jana
    Hill, Nikolas
    Istrate, Robert
    Jose, Davis
    Tegstedt, Fredrik
    Beylot, Antoine
    Menegazzi, Pascal
    Guinee, Jeroen
    Steubing, Bernhard
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 52 : 299 - 313
  • [27] A critical review on plastic waste life cycle assessment and management: Challenges, research gaps, and future perspectives
    Jiao, Haixin
    Ali, Sameh S.
    Alsharbaty, Mohammed Husssein M.
    Elsamahy, Tamer
    Abdelkarim, Esraa
    Schagerl, Michael
    Al-Tohamy, Rania
    Sun, Jianzhong
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2024, 271
  • [28] A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry
    Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 45 : 244 - 248
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of thermal Waste-to-Energy technologies: Review and recommendations
    Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard
    Tonini, Davide
    Turconi, Roberto
    Boldrin, Alessio
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 37 : 104 - 115
  • [30] A Review of Life Cycle Assessment Studies of Electric Vehicles with a Focus on Resource Use
    Dolganova, Iulia
    Roedl, Anne
    Bach, Vanessa
    Kaltschmitt, Martin
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2020, 9 (03):