A single instrument: Engineering and engineering technology students demonstrating competence in ethics and professional standards

被引:3
作者
Feldhaus, CR [1 ]
Wolter, RM [1 ]
Hundley, SP [1 ]
Diemer, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Purdue Sch Engn & Technol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
assessment; ethics; honors; ABET TAC Criterion;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-006-0028-5
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper details efforts by the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) to create a single instrument for honors science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) students wishing to demonstrate competence in the IUPUI Principles of Undergraduate Learning (PUL's) and Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Accreditation Criterion (EAC) and Technology Accreditation Criterion (TAC) 2, a through k. Honors courses in Human Behavior, Ethical Decision-Making, Applied Leadership, International Issues and Leadership Theories and Processes were created along with a specific menu of activities and an assessment rubric based on PUL's and ABET criteria to evaluate student performance in the aforementioned courses. Students who complete the series of 18 Honors Credit hours are eligible for an Honors Certificate in Leadership Studies from the Department of Organizational Leadership and Supervision. Finally, an accounting of how various university assessment criteria, in this case the IUPUI Principles of Undergraduate Learning, can be linked to ABET outcomes and prove student competence in both, using the aforementioned courses, menu of items, and assessment rubrics; these will be analyzed and discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 311
页数:21
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
*ABET, 2002, CRIT ACCR ENG PROGR, P1
[2]   Senior capstone design and ethics: A bridge to the professional world [J].
Catalano, GD .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2004, 10 (02) :409-415
[3]  
ELKHAWAS E, 1995, 85 AM COUNC ED
[4]  
EWELL PT, 1998, ASSESSMENT UPDATE, V10, P12
[5]  
Gall M.D., 1996, ED RES
[6]  
Harris C. E., 1996, Journal of Engineering Education, V85, P93, DOI 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x
[7]  
HERMAN JL, 1992, PRACTICAL GUIDE ALTE, P58
[8]  
McMillan J.H., 2001, CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT
[9]   The dilemma of ethics in engineering education [J].
Newberry, B .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2004, 10 (02) :343-351
[10]  
Palomba C.A., 1999, ASSESSMENT ESSENTIAL