Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Solving the Airport Ground Handling Service Equipment Vendor Selection Problem

被引：4
作者：
Shen, Chien-Wen [1 ]
Peng, Yen-Ting [1 ]
Tu, Chang-Shu [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, 300 Jhongda Rd, Jhongli 32001, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Informat Management, 259 Wen Hwa 1st Rd, Taoyuan 33333, Taiwan
[3] Nation Taiwan Univ Sci, Global Res & Ind Alliance, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
[4] Taiwan Express Co Ltd, Taipei 1049, Taiwan
来源：
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 12期
关键词：
equipment vendor selection; fuzzy TOPSIS; fuzzy weighted average left and right score; multi-choice goal programming; multi-aspiration goal programming; FUZZY; AHP; TOPSIS; MODEL; SYSTEM; MCDM;
D O I：
10.3390/su11123466
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
Appropriate airport ground handling service (AGHS) equipment vendor selection (AGHSEVS) can prevent aircraft damage and delays in airlines schedules, and ensure reliable and high-quality ground handling service. Previous research has seldom integrated multi-criteria decision-making techniques with goal programming to solve the AGHSEVS problem. This paper describes a new system evaluation model for AGHSEVS by considering both qualitative and quantitative methods. We compare the fuzzy TOPSIS method based on fuzzy weighted average left and right score methods with multi-choice and multi-aspiration goal programming approach of an AGHS company in Taiwan. These study results can help airport ground handling service company managers make optimal decisions for AGHSEVS problems. We hope the practicability of the comparable model with slight modifications of real situation data can be used in other AGHS companies.
引用
收藏
页数：21
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [11] Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
    Chen, CT
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [12] On fuzzy multiple objective linear programming problems
    Chung, Cheng-Kung
    Chen, Hsin Min
    Chang, Ching-Ter
    Huang, Hau-Lieng
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 114 : 552 - 562
  • [13] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yavuz, Serkan
    Kilinc, Nevzat
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 8143 - 8151
  • [14] Using fuzzy MCDM to select partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping
    Ding, JF
    Liang, GS
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2005, 173 (1-3) : 197 - 225
  • [15] Comparing efficiency of holding business model and individual management model of airports
    Ferreira, Diogo Cunha
    Marques, Rui Cunha
    Pedro, Maria Isabel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 57 : 168 - 183
  • [16] Fuhr Johannes., 2006, REV NETW ECON, V5, P386, DOI DOI 10.2202/1446-9022.1104
  • [17] An integrated fuzzy-lp approach for a supplier selection problem in supply chain management
    Guneri, Ali Fuat
    Yucel, Atakan
    Ayyildiz, Gokhan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (05) : 9223 - 9228
  • [18] Hwang C.-L., 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, P58, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93]
  • [19] Karimi H, 2012, INT J IND ENG-THEORY, V19, P456
  • [20] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments
    Karsak, EE
    Tolga, E
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2001, 69 (01) : 49 - 64
1234