Surgical and Pathologic Outcomes of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PA) After Preoperative Ablative Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (A-SMART)

被引:10
|
作者
Bryant, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Palm, Russell F. [1 ,2 ]
Liveringhouse, Casey [1 ,2 ]
Boyer, Emanuel [3 ]
Hodul, Pam [4 ]
Malafa, Mokenge [2 ,4 ]
Denbo, Jason [2 ,4 ]
Kim, Dae [2 ,4 ]
Carballido, Estrella [2 ,4 ]
Fleming, Jason B. [2 ,4 ]
Hoffe, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Frakes, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Res Inst, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Tampa, FL USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; CANCER; SBRT; GEMCITABINE; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2022.101045
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma reduces positive surgical margin rates, and when delivered to an ablative dose range it may improve local control and overall survival for patients with unresectable disease. Use of stereotactic body RT to achieve a higher biologically effective dose has been limited by toxicity to adjacent radiosensitive structures, but this can be mitigated by stereotactic magnetic resonance image guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART).Methods and Materials: We describe our single-institution experience of high biologically effective dose SMART before resection of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Toxicity was evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V 5.0). Tumor response was evaluated according to the College of American Pathologists tumor regression grading criteria.Results: We analyzed 26 patients with borderline resectable (80.8%), locally advanced (11.5%), and resectable (7.7%) tumors who received ablative dose SMART (A-SMART) followed by surgical resection. Median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 34-86). Most patients received chemotherapy (80.8%) before RT. All patients received A-SMART to a median dose of 50 (range, 40-50) Gy in 5 fractions. Toxicity data were collected prospectively and there were no acute grade 2+ toxicities associated with RT. The median time to resection was 50 days (range, 37-115), and the procedure types included Whipple (69%), distal (23%), or total pancreatectomy (8%). The R0 resection rate was 96% and no perioperative deaths occurred within 90 days. Pathologic response was observed in 88% of cases. The time from RT to surgery was associated with tumor regression grade (P = .0003). The median follow-up after RT was 16.5 months (range, 3.9-26.2). The derived median progression-free survival from RT was 13.2 months.Conclusions: The initial surgical and pathologic outcomes after A-SMART are encouraging. Preoperative A-SMART was associated with low toxicity rates and no surgical or RT-associated mortality. The surgical morbidity was comparable to historic rates after upfront resection. These data also suggest that the time from stereotactic body RT to surgical resection is associated with pathologic response.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Stereotactic MR-guided on-table adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multi-center, open-label phase 2 study
    Chuong, Michael D.
    Lee, Percy
    Low, Daniel A.
    Kim, Joshua
    Mittauer, Kathryn E.
    Bassetti, Michael F.
    Glide-Hurst, Carri K.
    Raldow, Ann C.
    Yang, Yingli
    Portelance, Lorraine
    Padgett, Kyle R.
    Zaki, Bassem
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Kim, Hyun
    Henke, Lauren E.
    Price, Alex T.
    Mancias, Joseph D.
    Williams, Christopher L.
    Ng, John
    Pennell, Ryan
    Pfeffer, M. Raphael
    Levin, Daphne
    Muellerm, Adam C.
    Mooneym, Karen E.
    Kellyn, Patrick
    Shahn, Amish P.
    Boldrini, Luca
    Placidi, Lorenzo
    Fuss, Martin
    Parikh, Parag Jitendra
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 191
  • [22] Clinical outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for primary and metastatic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis
    Yoon, Stephanie M.
    Luterstein, Elaine
    Chu, Fang-, I
    Cao, Minsong
    Lamb, James
    Agazaryan, Nzhde
    Low, Daniel
    Raldow, Ann
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Lee, Percy
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17): : 5897 - 5906
  • [23] Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to the Primary Renal Mass in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Rudra, Soumon
    Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin
    Pachynski, Russell
    Daly, Mackenzie
    Green, Olga
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 4 (04) : 566 - 570
  • [24] In Silico Single-Fraction Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Thoracic and Abdominal Oligometastatic Disease With Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance Guidance
    Lee, Sangjune
    Yadav, Poonam
    van der Kogel, Albert J.
    Bayouth, John
    Bassetti, Michael F.
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 6 (03)
  • [25] Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy With a Median Biologically Effective Dose of 100 Gy10 for Non-bone Oligometastases
    Kutuk, Tugce
    Herrera, Robert
    Mustafayev, Teuta Z.
    Gungor, Gorkem
    Ugurluer, Gamze
    Atalar, Banu
    Kotecha, Rupesh
    Hall, Matthew D.
    Rubens, Muni
    Mittauer, Kathryn E.
    Contreras, Jessika A.
    McCulloch, James
    Kalman, Noah S.
    Alvarez, Diane
    Romaguera, Tino
    Gutierrez, Alonso N.
    Garcia, Jacklyn
    Kaiser, Adeel
    Mehta, Minesh P.
    Ozyar, Enis
    Chuong, Michael D.
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 7 (06)
  • [26] Comparison of online adaptive and non-adaptive magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer using dose accumulation
    Murr, Martina
    Wegener, Daniel
    Boeke, Simon
    Gani, Cihan
    Moennich, David
    Niyazi, Maximilian
    Schneider, Moritz
    Zips, Daniel
    Mueller, Arndt-Christian
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 32
  • [27] Simulated Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease of the Abdomen and Central Thorax: Characterization of Potential Advantages
    Henke, Lauren
    Kashani, Rojano
    Yang, Deshan
    Zhao, Tianyu
    Green, Olga
    Olsen, Lindsey
    Rodriguez, Vivian
    Wooten, H. Omar
    Li, H. Harold
    Hu, Yanle
    Bradley, Jeffrey
    Robinson, Clifford
    Parikh, Parag
    Michalski, Jeff
    Mutic, Sasa
    Olsen, Jeffrey R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (05): : 1078 - 1086
  • [28] Threshold Doses for Focal Liver Reaction After Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Depend on Liver Function: Evaluation on Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gd-EOB-DTPA
    Sanuki, Naoko
    Takeda, Atsuya
    Oku, Yohei
    Eriguchi, Takahisa
    Nishimura, Shuichi
    Aoki, Yosuke
    Mizuno, Tomikazu
    Iwabuchi, Shogo
    Kunieda, Etsuo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02): : 306 - 311
  • [29] Targeting Accuracy of Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-Life Clinical Practice: In Vivo Assessment Using Hepatic Parenchymal Changes on Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images
    Jung, Jinhong
    Kim, Hojin
    Yoon, Sang Min
    Cho, Byungchul
    Kim, Yeon Joo
    Kwak, Jungwon
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (04): : 867 - 874
  • [30] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of osseous spine metastasis before and 1 hour after high-dose image-guided radiation therapy
    Lis, Eric
    Saha, Atin
    Peck, Kyung K.
    Zatcky, Joan
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Holodny, Andrei I.
    Bilsky, Mark H.
    Karimi, Sasan
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2017, 42 (01)