Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Setia, Maninder Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] MGM Inst Hlth Sci, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Database; meta-analysis; systematic reviews; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY; LEPROSY;
D O I
10.4103/0019-5154.193663
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have become an important of biomedical literature, and they provide the "highest level of evidence" for various clinical questions. There are a lot of studies - sometimes with contradictory conclusions - on a particular topic in literature. Hence, as a clinician, which results will you believe? What will you tell your patient? Which drug is better? A systematic review or a meta-analysis may help us answer these questions. In addition, it may also help us understand the quality of the articles in literature or the type of studies that have been conducted and published (example, randomized trials or observational studies). The first step it to identify a research question for systematic review or meta-analysis. The next step is to identify the articles that will be included in the study. This will be done by searching various databases; it is important that the researcher should search for articles in more than one database. It will also be useful to form a group of researchers and statisticians that have expertise in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis before initiating them. We strongly encourage the readers to register their proposed review/meta-analysis with PROSPERO. Finally, these studies should be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis checklist.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 607
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] A General Framework for the Evaluation of Clinical Trial Quality
    Berger, Vance W.
    Alperson, Sunny Y.
    [J]. REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 4 (02) : 79 - 88
  • [2] Egger M., 2001, Systematic reviews in health care
  • [3] Lichen Planus Pigmentosus: The Controversial Consensus
    Ghosh, Aparajita
    Coondoo, Arijit
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 61 (05) : 482 - 486
  • [4] GREENLAND S, 1987, EPIDEMIOL REV, V9, P1
  • [5] Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
    Jadad, AR
    Moore, RA
    Carroll, D
    Jenkinson, C
    Reynolds, DJM
    Gavaghan, DJ
    McQuay, HJ
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1996, 17 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [6] Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: A systematic review
    Olivo, Susan Armijo
    Macedo, Luciana Gazzi
    Gadotti, Inae Caroline
    Fuentes, Jorge
    Stanton, Tasha
    Magee, David J.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 88 (02): : 156 - 175
  • [7] Petitti D.B., 2000, METAANALYSIS DECISIO
  • [8] Porta M., 2014, DICT EPIDEMIOLOGY, P343, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACREF/9780199976720.001.0001, 10.1093/acref/9780199976720.001.0001]
  • [9] Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of Antibiotics and Their Use in Dermatology
    Pradhan, Swetalina
    Madke, Bhushan
    Kabra, Poonam
    Singh, Adarsh Lata
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 61 (05) : 469 - 481
  • [10] Rajaratnam R, 2010, INTERVENTIONS MELASM