Resilience in transportation systems: a systematic review and future directions

被引:279
作者
Wan, Chengpeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Zaili [3 ]
Zhang, Di [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Xinping [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Shiqi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Intelligent Transportat Syst Res Ctr, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Natl Engn Res Ctr Water Transport Safety, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Liverpool Logist Offshore & Marine Res Inst, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
The Belt and Road (B&R); resilience; transportation systems; literature review; the Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road; RISK-ASSESSMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE RESILIENCE; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road (B&R) initiative was introduced by the Chinese government to promote the worldwide economic development and multilateral cooperation between China and the associated countries. As a crucial part of global supply chains, transportation plays a key role to ensure the implementation of the B&R. Safety is one of the issues with great importance in transportation research. However, its foci have been expanded from traditional risk through security to resilience and sustainability. Resilience has attracted considerable interests from both researchers and practitioners across different research domains in recent years. Various studies have been conducted on transportation resilience from different perspectives. Consequently, different definitions have been developed to define and describe resilience. This paper presents a systematic review on transportation resilience with emphasis on its definitions, characteristics, and research methods applied in different transportation systems/contexts. It aims to figure out what transportation resilience is and what kind of essential characters it usually has. More importantly, research challenges are analysed and a future research agenda on the resilience of transportation systems is proposed. This paper will provide comprehensive insights into understanding the transportation resilience, as well as establish new horizons for relevant research topics within the context of the B&R.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 498
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Freight Resilience Measures [J].
Adams, Teresa M. ;
Bekkem, Kaushik R. ;
Toledo-Duran, Edwin J. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2012, 138 (11) :1403-1409
[2]   Social and ecological resilience: are they related? [J].
Adger, WN .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) :347-364
[3]   A model to quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems [J].
Adjetey-Bahun, Kpotissan ;
Birregah, Babiga ;
Chatelet, Eric ;
Planchet, Jean-Luc .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 153 :1-14
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Critical Infrastructure Resilience Final Report and Recommendations
[5]   Assess the vulnerability of your production system [J].
Asbjornslett, BE ;
Rausand, M .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1999, 10 (03) :219-229
[6]   Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Zio, Enrico .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (01) :64-74
[7]   Resilience-based network component importance measures [J].
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel ;
Rocco, Claudio M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 117 :89-97
[8]   Inherent Costs and Interdependent Impacts of Infrastructure Network Resilience [J].
Baroud, Hiba ;
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. ;
Rocco, Claudio M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (04) :642-662
[9]   Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience [J].
Baroud, Hiba ;
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. ;
Rocco S, Claudio M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 62 :55-67
[10]   Stakeholder Perceptions of Seaport Resilience Strategies: A Case Study of Gulfport (Mississippi) and Providence (Rhode Island) [J].
Becker, Austin ;
Caldwell, Margaret R. .
COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 43 (01) :1-34