Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Nonculprit Vessels in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

被引:35
|
作者
Yang, Jeong Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Hahn, Joo-Yong [1 ]
Song, Pil Sang [3 ]
Song, Young Bin [1 ]
Choi, Seung-Hyuk [1 ]
Choi, Jin-Ho [1 ]
Lee, Sang Hoon [1 ]
Jeong, Myung-Ho [4 ]
Choi, Dong-Joo [5 ]
Kim, Young Jo [6 ]
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Med,Div Cardiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Crit Care Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Haeundae Paik Hosp, Dept Med, Coll Med, Pusan, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Kwangju, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Bundang Hosp, Songnam, South Korea
[6] Yeungnam Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; cardiogenic shock; revascularization; EARLY REVASCULARIZATION; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; TEMPORAL TRENDS; MULTIVESSEL; CULPRIT; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; REGISTRY;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a2701d
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: We investigated the clinical impact of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with multivessel disease. Design: A prospective, multicenter, observational study. Setting: Cardiac ICU of a university hospital. Patients: Between November 2005 and September 2010, 338 patients were selected. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock and 2) multivessel disease with successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the infarct-related artery. Patients were divided into multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Median follow-up duration was 224 days (interquartile range, 46-383 d). Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention was performed during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 60 patients (17.8%). In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention vs culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention, 31.7% vs 24.5%; p = 0.247). All-cause mortality during follow-up was not significantly different between the two groups after adjusting for patient, angiographic, and procedural characteristics as well as propensity scores for receiving multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (35.0% vs 30.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.61-1.86; p = 0.831). There were no significant differences between the groups in rates of major adverse cardiac events (41.7% vs 37.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62-1.71; p = 0.908) and any revascularization (6.7% vs 4.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.51-6.89; p = 0.344). Conclusions: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention could not reduce the prevalence of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coronary Thrombectomy in a Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Suzuki, Makoto
    Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya
    Miyaji, Hideki
    Yoshikawa, Masatomo
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Yamasaki, Masao
    Miyauchi, Katsumi
    Takagi, Atsushi
    Yamamoto, Takeshi
    Nagao, Ken
    Tomoike, Hitonobu
    Takayama, Morimasa
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130 (23) : 2126 - 2126
  • [2] Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock
    Lee, Joo Myung
    Rhee, Tae-Min
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    Kim, Hyun Kuk
    Park, Jonghanne
    Hwang, Doyeon
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Kim, Jihoon
    Park, Taek Kyu
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Bin Song, Young
    Choi, Jin-Ho
    Choi, Seung-Hyuk
    Koo, Bon-Kwon
    Kim, Young Jo
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Cho, Myeong Chan
    Kim, Chong Jin
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    Kim, Ju Han
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (08) : 844 - 856
  • [3] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Damluji, Abdulla A.
    Bandeen-Roche, Karen
    Berkower, Carol
    Boyd, Cynthia M.
    Al-Damluji, Mohammed S.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Forman, Daniel E.
    Chaudhary, Rahul
    Gerstenblith, Gary
    Walston, Jeremy D.
    Resar, Jon R.
    Moscucci, Mauro
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (15) : 1890 - 1900
  • [4] Effect of Coronary Thrombectomy in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Suzuki, Makoto
    Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya
    Miyachi, Hidelci
    Yamashita, Jun
    Yamasaki, Masao
    Miyauchi, Katsumi
    Yamamoto, Takeshi
    Nagao, Ken
    Tomoike, Hitonobu
    Takayama, Morimasa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (12): : 1649 - 1654
  • [5] Impact of thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Tomassini, Francesco
    Gagnor, Andrea
    Montali, Nicolo
    Gambino, Alfonso
    Bollati, Mario
    Infantino, Vincenzo
    Rigattieri, Stefano
    Varbella, Ferdinando
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (06) : 307 - 310
  • [6] Transradial Artery Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Schoenfeld M.S.
    Kassas I.
    Shah B.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2018, 20 (2)
  • [7] Re: Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock
    Secemsky, Eric A.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (06) : E59 - E60
  • [8] Re: Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock Response
    Rhee, Tae-Min
    Lee, Joo Myung
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Kim, Jihoon
    Kim, Hyun Kuk
    Song, Young Bin
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (06) : E60 - E61
  • [9] Delays in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock
    Kochar, Ajar
    Al-Khalidi, Hussein R.
    Hansen, Steen M.
    Shavadia, Jay S.
    Roettig, Mayme L.
    Fordyce, Christopher B.
    Doerfler, Shannon
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Henry, Timothy D.
    Berger, Peter B.
    Jollis, James G.
    Granger, Christopher B.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (18) : 1824 - 1833
  • [10] Fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial a infarction cardiogenic shock
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    Verghese, Dhiran
    Bell, Malcolm R.
    Murphree, Dennis H.
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Miller, Paul Elliott
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Prasad, Abhiram
    Sandhu, Gurpreet S.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Singh, Mandeep
    Lerman, Amir
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (03): : 2025 - 2035