A Review of the Pharmacology, Efficacy and Tolerability of Recently Approved and Upcoming Oral Antipsychotics: An Evidence-Based Medicine Approach

被引:76
作者
Citrome, Leslie [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
PSYCHIATRY WFSBP GUIDELINES; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; LONG-TERM TREATMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; WORLD FEDERATION; ACUTE MANIA; SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER; CLINICAL-EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s40263-013-0105-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a broad concept, but the key elements include the incorporation of clinical judgment (which requires clinical experience) together with relevant scientific evidence while remaining mindful of the individual patient's values and preferences. Using the framework and philosophy of EBM, this systematic review summarizes the pharmacology, efficacy, and tolerability of newly approved oral antipsychotics, including iloperidone, asenapine, and lurasidone, and outlines what is known about agents that are in late-stage clinical development, such as cariprazine, brexpiprazole, zicronapine, bitopertin, and EVP-6124. Potential advantages and disadvantages of these agents over existing antipsychotics are outlined, centered on clinically relevant issues such as the potential for weight gain and metabolic abnormalities, potential association with somnolence/sedation, extra-pyramidal side effects, akathisia, and prolongation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) QT interval, as well as practical issues regarding dosing instructions, titration requirements, and drug-drug interactions. Lurasidone appears to be best in class in terms of minimizing untoward alterations in body weight and metabolic variables. However, iloperidone, asenapine, lurasidone, and cariprazine differ among themselves in terms of on-label dosing frequency (once daily for lurasidone and, presumably, cariprazine versus twice daily for iloperidone and asenapine), the need for initial titration to a therapeutic dose for iloperidone and possibly cariprazine, requirement to be taken sublingually for asenapine, requirement for administration with food for lurasidone, lengthening of the ECG QT interval (greater for iloperidone than for asenapine and no effect observed with lurasidone), and adverse effects such as akathisia (seen with cariprazine, lurasidone, and asenapine but not with iloperidone) and sedation (most notable with asenapine).
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 911
页数:33
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [1] Glycine reuptake inhibitor RG1678: A pharmacologic characterization of an investigational agent for the treatment of schizophrenia
    Alberati, Daniela
    Moreau, Jean-Luc
    Lengyel, Judith
    Hauser, Nicole
    Mory, Roland
    Borroni, Edilio
    Pinard, Emmanuel
    Knoflach, Frederic
    Schlotterbeck, Goetz
    Hainzl, Dominik
    Wettstein, Joseph G.
    [J]. NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 62 (02) : 1152 - 1161
  • [2] [Anonymous], NEUROPSYCHOPHARMAC S
  • [3] [Anonymous], DHEW PUBL
  • [4] [Anonymous], NEUROPSYCHOPHARMAC S
  • [5] The 5-HT7 receptor: Role in novel object discrimination and relation to novelty-seeking behavior
    Ballaz, S. J.
    Akil, H.
    Watson, S. J.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 149 (01) : 192 - 202
  • [6] Is there a role for 5-HT1A agonists in the treatment of depression?
    Blier, P
    Ward, NM
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 53 (03) : 193 - 203
  • [7] Bose A, 2010, NCDEU 50 ANN M JUN 1
  • [8] Asenapine Versus Olanzapine in People With Persistent Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia
    Buchanan, Robert W.
    Panagides, John
    Zhao, Jun
    Phiri, Phillip
    den Hollander, Wil
    Ha, Xianwei
    Kouassi, Alex
    Alphs, Larry
    Schooler, Nina
    Szegedi, Armin
    Cazorla, Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 32 (01) : 36 - 45
  • [9] Exposure-Response Analysis in Patients With Schizophrenia to Assess the Effect of Asenapine on QTc Prolongation
    Chapel, Sunny
    Hutmacher, Matt M.
    Haig, George
    Bockbrader, Howard
    de Greef, Rik
    Preskorn, Sheldon H.
    Lalonde, Richard L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 49 (11) : 1297 - 1308
  • [10] Compelling or irrelevant? Using number needed to treat can help decide
    Citrome, L.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 117 (06) : 412 - 419