Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?

被引：33
作者：
Klenk, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Duijf, Hein [3 ]
机构：
[1] Inst Business Eth, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源：
ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 2021年 / 23卷 / SUPPL 1期
基金：
欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词：
COVID-19; Digital ethics; Fairness; Digital contact tracing; Active responsibility;
D O I：
10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective is notsolelyto maximise the ratio of people freed from quarantine but to also ensure that the composition of the freed group is fair. We identify several factors that pose a risk for fair group composition along with an analysis of general lessons for a philosophy of technology. Policymakers, epidemiologists, and developers can use these risk factors to benchmark proposal technologies, curb the pandemic, and keep public trust.
引用
收藏
页码：69 / 77
页数：9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Anderson R., 2020, CONTACT TRACING REAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ECONOMIST, P69
[3]  
Azevedo Silva M., 2020, COVID 19 APPS
[4]  
Barr C., 2020, The Guardian
[5]  
Bell James, 2020, Tracesecure: Towards privacy preserving contact tracing
[6]  
Bicchieri C., 2005, GRAMMAR SOC NATURE D
[7]  
Bowles S., 2016, Substitute for Raised H.B.
[8]   Health surveillance during covid-19 pandemic [J].
Calvo, Rafael A. ;
Deterding, Sebastian ;
Ryan, Richard M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 369
[9]  
Demirag D., 2020, TRACKING CONTROLLING
[10]   Network Effects and Social Inequality [J].
DiMaggio, Paul ;
Garip, Filiz .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 38, 2012, 38 :93-118
12345