Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model

被引:1562
作者
Charles, C
Gafni, A
Whelan, T
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Ctr Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Sociol, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Support Canc Care Res Unit, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] OCTRF, Hamilton Reg Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
关键词
treatment decision-making; doctor-patient relationship; communication; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00145-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In this paper we revisit and add elements to our earlier conceptual framework on shared treatment decisionmaking within the context of different decision-making approaches in the medical encounter (Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T., 1997. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or, it takes at least two to tango). Social Science Br Medicine 44, 681-692.), This revised framework (1) explicitly identifies different analytic steps in the treatment decision-making process; (2) provides a dynamic view of treatment decision-making by recognizing that the approach adopted at the outset of a medical encounter may change as the interaction evolves; (3) identifies decision-making approaches which lie between the three predominant models (paternalistic, shared and informed) and (4) has practical applications for clinical practice, research and medical education. Rather than advocating a particular approach, we emphasize the importance of flexibility in the way that physicians structure the decision-making process so that individual differences in patient preferences can be respected. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 661
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   The meaning of 6.8: Numeracy and normality in health information talks [J].
Adelsward, V ;
Sachs, L .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1996, 43 (08) :1179-1187
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, DISCOURSE MED DIALEC
[3]   PATIENT REACTIONS TO A PROGRAM DESIGNED TO FACILITATE PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN TREATMENT DECISIONS FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA [J].
BARRY, MJ ;
FOWLER, FJ ;
MULLEY, AG ;
HENDERSON, JV ;
WENNBERG, JE .
MEDICAL CARE, 1995, 33 (08) :771-782
[4]  
Beisecker A.E., 1993, Health Communication, V5, P41, DOI [10.1207/S15327027HC0501_3, DOI 10.1207/S15327027HC0501_3]
[5]   HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH AND QUALITY OF CARE - ASSIGNMENTS FOR THE 1990S [J].
BERWICK, DM .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (08) :763-771
[6]  
Blumer H., 1986, SYMB INTERACT
[7]   WHEN COMPETENT PATIENTS MAKE IRRATIONAL CHOICES [J].
BROCK, DW ;
WARTMAN, SA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (22) :1595-1599
[8]   THE PATIENTS ROLE IN CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING [J].
BRODY, DS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 93 (05) :718-722
[9]   Patient participation: A concept analysis [J].
Cahill, J .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1996, 24 (03) :561-571
[10]   Medical necessity in Canadian health policy: Four meanings and ... a funeral? [J].
Charles, C ;
Lomas, J ;
Giacomini, M .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1997, 75 (03) :365-+