Clinical significance of preoperative imaging in oral squamous cell carcinoma compared with lymph node status: a comparative retrospective study

被引:3
作者
Mazzawi, Elias [1 ]
Abu El-naaj, Imad [2 ]
Ghantous, Yasmine [2 ]
Balan, Salim [3 ]
Sabo, Edmond [4 ]
Rachmiel, Adi [5 ]
Leiser, Yoav [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Orthoped Surg Div, Rambam Med Campus, Haifa, Israel
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Fac Med, Baruch Padeh Med Ctr, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Galilee, Israel
[3] Technion, Fac Med, Head & Neck Oncol Serv, Dept Oncol, Rambam Med Campus, Haifa, Israel
[4] Technion, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Gastrointestinal Pathol Serv, Rambam Med Campus, Haifa, Israel
[5] Technion, Fac Med, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Rambam Med Campus, Haifa, Israel
[6] Technion, Fac Med, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Rambam Med Campus, Haifa, Israel
[7] Technion, Fac Med, Oral Canc Res Lab, Rambam Med Campus, Haifa, Israel
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY | 2018年 / 125卷 / 05期
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; METASTATIC NECK NODES; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; FDG PET; HEAD; CANCER; CT; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2017.11.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The accuracy and sensitivity of commonly used imaging modalities in evaluating oral cavity cancer was evaluated by comparing the preoperative radiologic findings and the postoperative pathology report. Study Design. Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma, who had undergone at least 1 imaging test 2 weeks before surgery were included. Radiologic findings were compared with the dissected neck findings to assess the lymph node status. Sensitivity and specificity of the imaging modalities were calculated by using the chi(2) test. Results. Sensitivities for detecting metastatic neck lymph nodes at a threshold of 1 cm were 48% (P = .02) and 43.8% (P = .3) for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging respectively. Specificities were 76.3% and 70%, respectively. As for the 1.5 cm threshold, sensitivities were 36% (P = .002) and 31.3% (P = .5), respectively, and specificities were 91.5% and 76.7%, respectively. PET-CT was the most sensitive modality in the present study, with a P value of .02. Conclusions. The different studied imaging modalities used for preoperative neck staging are not sensitive enough and would lead to underdiagnoses of a significant proportion of patients. Thus, prophylactic neck dissection for occult neck disease is of extreme importance and remains the gold standard for oral cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 430
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer [J].
Adams, S ;
Baum, RP ;
Stuckensen, T ;
Bitter, K ;
Hör, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 25 (09) :1255-1260
[2]   Comparison between 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-Glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography hardware fusion for staging of patients with lymphoma [J].
Allen-Auerbach, M ;
Quon, A ;
Weber, WA ;
Obrzut, S ;
Crawford, T ;
Silverman, DHS ;
Ratib, O ;
Phelps, ME ;
Czernin, J .
MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 6 (06) :411-416
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SEER Cancer Statistics Review
[4]   Non-small cell lung cancer: Dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging [J].
Antoch, G ;
Stattaus, J ;
Nemat, AT ;
Marnitz, S ;
Beyer, T ;
Kuehl, H ;
Bockisch, A ;
Debatin, JF ;
Freudenberg, LS .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (02) :526-533
[5]  
Aulino Joseph M, 2006, Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, V18, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.coms.2006.06.011
[6]   Chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An individual patient data meta-analysis of eight randomized trials and 1753 patients [J].
Baujat, B ;
Audry, W ;
Bourhis, J ;
Chan, ATC ;
Onat, H ;
Chua, DTT ;
Kwong, DLW ;
al-Sarraf, M ;
Chi, KH ;
Hareyama, M ;
Leung, SF ;
Thephamongkhol, K ;
Pignon, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (01) :47-56
[7]   Prognostic evaluation of oral tongue cancer: Means, markers and perspectives (I) [J].
Bello, Ibrahim O. ;
Soini, Ylermi ;
Salo, Tuula .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 46 (09) :630-635
[8]   Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases [J].
Curtin, HD ;
Ishwaran, H ;
Mancuso, AA ;
Dalley, RW ;
Caudry, DJ ;
McNeil, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (01) :123-130
[9]   Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region:: Comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET [J].
Dammann, F ;
Horger, M ;
Mueller-Berg, M ;
Schlemmer, H ;
Claussen, C ;
Hoffman, J ;
Eschmann, S ;
Bares, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) :1326-1331
[10]   Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging [J].
de Bondt, R. B. J. ;
Nelemans, P. J. ;
Hofman, P. A. M. ;
Casselman, J. W. ;
Kremer, B. ;
van Engelshoven, J. M. A. ;
Beets-Tan, R. G. H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 64 (02) :266-272