A techno-economic assessment of gas-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid plants through the development of scale factors

被引:27
作者
Mohajerani, Sara [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
Oni, Abayomi Olufemi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn 10 263, Dept Mech Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Gas-to-liquid; Coal-to-liquid; CCS; Techno-economic assessment; Western Canada; Production cost; INTERNATIONAL INFLATION INDEXES; COMMERCIALLY READY TECHNOLOGY; LIFE-CYCLE GHG; FISCHER-TROPSCH; NATURAL-GAS; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; LOCATION FACTORS; CTL PLANTS; UP FACTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.005
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Fluctuations in conventional crude oil price globally and initiatives towards the phase-out of coal-based power have initiated a focus on alternative sources of liquid fuels from natural gas and coal. Gas-to-liquid (GTL) and coal-to-liquid (CTL) processes are two liquefaction technologies that could be used. There is a limited work on either the development of scale factors to estimate capital costs or on techno-economic assessments of the plants. This study addresses this gap and focusses on western Canada, which has large deposits of coal and natural gas. The capital costs of the plants' key equipment are estimated through the development of cost scale-up factors. The production cost for 50,000 bbliday of liquid fuels from GTL and CTL plants is estimated through modelling using a bottom-up approach. The developed scale-up factors for the GTL and CTL plants were found to be 0.70 and 0.65, respectively. For both plants, most of the benefits of economies of scale are achieved at a capacity of 20,000 bbl/day. The production costs of the GTL and CTL processes are 44.61 and 57.65 Canadian cents/liter respectively. With carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), the production cost of fuel from the CTL plant is higher than from the GTL plant. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 693
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HDB HETEROGENEOUS CA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PNNL18284
[3]   Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes [J].
Bao, Buping ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. ;
Elbashir, Nimir O. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 91 (07) :703-713
[4]   Modeling and economic evaluation of the integration of carbon capture and storage technologies into coal to liquids plants [J].
Bassano, Claudia ;
Deiana, Paolo ;
Girardi, Giuseppe .
FUEL, 2014, 116 :850-860
[5]  
Bibber V, 2007, DOENETL20071260
[6]  
Boothe P, 2017, NUMBERS CANADIAN GHG
[7]   Techno-economic analysis of biomass to transportation fuels and electricity via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing [J].
Brown, Tristan R. ;
Thilakaratne, Rajeeva ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Hu, Guiping .
FUEL, 2013, 106 :463-469
[8]   The potential of gas-to-liquid technology in the energy market: The case of Qatar [J].
Chedid, R. ;
Kobrosly, M. ;
Ghajar, R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (10) :4799-4811
[9]   Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology.: PartA:: Performance and emissions [J].
Chiesa, P ;
Consonni, S ;
Kreutz, T ;
Williams, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2005, 30 (07) :747-767
[10]  
Choi G.N., 1996, PREPR PAP AM CHEM SO, V41, P1079