Collaborative use of geodesign tools to support decision-making on adaptation to climate change

被引:20
作者
Eikelboom, Tessa [1 ]
Janssen, Ron [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Econ, Dept Spatial Econ, Spatial Informat Lab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Geodesign; Stakeholders; Spatial planning; Regional climate adaptation; STRATEGIES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11027-015-9633-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Spatial planners around the world need to make climate change adaptation plans. Climate adaptation planning requires combining spatial information with stakeholder values. This study demonstrates the potential of geodesign tools as a mean to integrate spatial analysis with stakeholder participation in adaptation planning. The tools are interactive and provide dynamic feedback on stakeholder objectives in response to the application of spatial measures. Different rationalities formed by underlying internalized values influence the reasoning of decision-making. Four tools were developed, each tailored to different rationalities varying between a collective or individual viewpoint and analytical or political arguments. The tools were evaluated in an experiment with four groups of participants that were set around an interactive mapping device: the touch table. To study how local decision-making on adaptation can be supported, this study focuses on a specific case study in the Netherlands. In this case study, multiple different stakeholders need to make spatial decisions on land use and water management planning in response to climate change. The collaborative use of four geodesign tools was evaluated in an interactive experiment. The results show that the geodesign tools were able to integrate the engagement of stakeholders and assessment of measures. The experiment showed that decision-making on adaptation to climate change can benefit from the use of geodesign tools as long as the tool is carefully matched to the rationality that applies to the adaptation issue. Although the tools were tested to support the design of adaptation plans in a Dutch setting, the tools could be used for regional adaptation planning in other countries such as the development of regional adaptation strategies (RAS) as required by the European Union or on a national scale to support developing national adaptation plans of action (NAPAs) as initiated by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) for least developed countries.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 266
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   An Experimental Study of Executive Decision-Making With Implications for Decision Support [J].
Ow, Terence T. ;
Morris, James G. .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMPUTING AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2010, 20 (04) :370-397
[42]   Decision-making in tunneling using artificial intelligence tools [J].
Mahmoodzadeh, Arsalan ;
Mohammadi, Mokhtar ;
Daraei, Ako ;
Faraj, Rabar H. ;
Omer, Rebaz Mohammed Dler ;
Sherwani, Aryan Far H. .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 103
[43]   Convection-Permitting Regional Climate Change Simulations for Understanding Future Climate and Informing Decision-Making in Africa [J].
Senior, Catherine A. ;
Marsham, John H. ;
Berthou, Segolene ;
Burgin, Laura E. ;
Folwell, Sonja S. ;
Kendon, Elizabeth J. ;
Klein, Cornelia M. ;
Jones, Richard G. ;
Mittal, Neha ;
Rowell, David P. ;
Tomassini, Lorenzo ;
Vischel, Theo ;
Becker, Bernd ;
Birch, Cathryn E. ;
Crook, Julia ;
Dougill, Andrew J. ;
Finney, Declan L. ;
Graham, Richard J. ;
Hart, Neil C. G. ;
Jack, Christopher D. ;
Jackson, Lawrence S. ;
James, Rachel ;
Koelle, Bettina ;
Misiani, Herbert ;
Mwalukanga, Brenda ;
Parker, Douglas J. ;
Stratton, Rachel A. ;
Taylor, Christopher M. ;
Tucker, Simon O. ;
Wainwright, Caroline M. ;
Washington, Richard ;
Willet, Martin R. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 102 (06) :E1206-E1223
[44]   APOLLO: A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Tool in Support of Climate Policy [J].
Labella, Alvaro ;
Koasidis, Konstantinos ;
Nikas, Alexandros ;
Arsenopoulos, Apostolos ;
Doukas, Haris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2020, 13 (01) :1539-1553
[45]   Personalized Decision-Making Framework for Collaborative Lane Change and Speed Control Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning [J].
Peng, Jiankun ;
Yu, Sichen ;
Ge, Yuming ;
Li, Shen ;
Fan, Yi ;
Zhou, Jiaxuan ;
He, Hongwen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2025,
[46]   Ecosystem services based spatial planning decision making for adaptation to climate changes [J].
Onur, A. Ceren ;
Tezer, Azime .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 47 :267-278
[47]   Decision-making on food cold chain collaborative distribution models [J].
Lan, Hongjie ;
Xue, Hailin .
Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 2012, 4 (23) :660-666
[48]   Conserving Biodiversity: Practical Guidance about Climate Change Adaptation Approaches in Support of Land-use Planning [J].
Schmitz, Oswald J. ;
Lawler, Joshua J. ;
Beier, Paul ;
Groves, Craig ;
Knight, Gary ;
Boyce, Douglas A., Jr. ;
Bulluck, Jason ;
Johnston, Kevin M. ;
Klein, Mary L. ;
Muller, Kit ;
Pierce, D. John ;
Singleton, William R. ;
Strittholt, James R. ;
Theobald, David M. ;
Trombulak, Stephen C. ;
Trainor, Anne .
NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (01) :190-203
[49]   Decision-making for community resilience: A review of decision support systems and their applications [J].
Elkady, Sahar ;
Hernantes, Josune ;
Labaka, Leire .
HELIYON, 2024, 10 (12)
[50]   Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review [J].
Aldaghi, Tahmineh ;
Muzik, Jan .
JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 12