Assessment of a Chain Mower Performance for Weed Control under Tree Rows in an Alley Cropping Farming System

被引:3
作者
Gagliardi, Lorenzo [1 ]
Fontanelli, Marco [1 ]
Frasconi, Christian [1 ]
Sportelli, Mino [1 ]
Antichi, Daniele [1 ]
Tramacere, Lorenzo Gabriele [1 ]
Rallo, Giovanni [1 ]
Peruzzi, Andrea [1 ]
Raffaelli, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Agr Food & Environm, Via Borghetto 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
agroforestry; under-row weed control; automatic tree-skipping; mechanical weed control; no-till strategies; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy12112785
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the area under tree rows of alley cropping systems, coarse plant material as well as pruning material or stones may be present, so the use of a mower equipped with chains as cutting a tool could be advantageous. A mower designed for under-row weed control in orchards, equipped with an automatic tree-skipping mechanism, was modified by replacing blades with chains with the aim of evaluating its performance in an alley cropping system. A first trial was carried out in an open field to preliminarily compare the chain mower with the version equipped with blades in relation to different settings of working speed (1.6 and 2.4 km center dot h(-1)) and rotation speed of the cutting tool (1830 and 2500 rpm). Weed biomass reduction, weed cover reduction, weed height reduction, weed biomass regrowth, and clipping size were assessed. In a second trial, the performance of the mowers with different setting configurations was assessed in an alley cropping system under a more critical environmental condition for mowing, i.e., the presence of dew. Weed biomass reduction, weed cover reduction, weed height reduction, and the mowers' field capacity with different working speed settings were assessed. No major differences emerged between the mowers and the chain mower performance was comparable to that of the standard blade mower. The setting with the high working speed and high rotation speed of the cutting tool turns out to be the best compromise, obtaining a weed biomass reduction of 59.6%, a weed cover reduction of 40.9%, and a higher field capacity compared to the setting with the low working speed, with an increase of 47.9%.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], USDA AGROFORESTRY
  • [2] [Anonymous], KELLFRI CHAIN MULCHE
  • [3] [Anonymous], NOBILI BE MULCHER
  • [4] [Anonymous], FAO AGROFORESTRY
  • [5] [Anonymous], VENTURA FORESTRY MAC
  • [6] Beard J.B., 1973, Turfgrass: Science and culture
  • [7] Bertucci M., 2018, DIV AGR RES EXT U AR, VFSA6023, P1
  • [8] Agroforestry offers multiple ecosystem services in degraded lateritic soils
    Biswas, Benukar
    Chakraborty, Debashis
    Timsina, Jagadish
    Bhowmick, Udayan Rudra
    Dhara, Pratap Kumar
    Ghosh , Dipak Kumar
    Sarkar, Arindam
    Mondal, Mousumi
    Adhikary, Saju
    Kanthal, Sahely
    Patra, Kiranmay
    Sarkar, Sukamal
    Parsad, Rajender
    Ray, Bikash Ranjan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [9] Alley cropping agroforestry systems: Reservoirs for weeds or refugia for plant diversity?
    Boinot, Sebastien
    Fried, Guillaume
    Storkey, Jonathan
    Metcalfe, Helen
    Barkaoui, Karim
    Lauri, Pierre-Eric
    Meziere, Delphine
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 284
  • [10] Burgess P.J., 2003, IMPACT SILVOARABLE A